The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Equity and Liabilities – A Discussion of IAS 32 and a Critique of the Classification
Open accessAbstract
It is a traditional convention in accounting to distinguish between two classes of claims, liabilities and equity. The International Accounting Standards Board and the Financial Accounting Standards Board have been using a dichotomous classification approach, adhering to this convention. However, over the recent years, this approach has been put under stress. First, there is an ever-growing variety of hybrid financial instruments, some of which designed to exploit this classification approach (accounting arbitrage). Second, the adoption of IFRS in Europe and elsewhere has brought scenarios to light in which the classification approach does not result in decision-useful information. These issues arise when IFRS are applied by entities in legal forms other than a private or public limited company. This essay discusses IAS 32 in the light of the historic origins of the dichotomous classification approach, the recent standard-setting activities and a review of the empirical research. This essay suggests that a reconsideration of the traditional dichotomous classification might be a way forward.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 31 · Cited by 21
Research works printed but not linked: 35
- 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00195.x · DOI
- American Accounting Association, 1993, Accounting Horizons, 7, 105
- 10.2308/acch.1999.13.3.305 · DOI
- 10.2308/acch.2001.15.4.387 · DOI
- Beaver W. H., 1970, The Accounting Review, 45, 654
- 10.2308/accr.2005.80.1.21 · DOI
- 10.2308/acch.2005.19.3.159 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1008240603745 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1052-0457(02)16001-2 · DOI
- Choi F. D. S., 1991, The Capital Market Effects of International Accounting Diversity
- 10.1080/09638180600920350 · DOI
- 10.2307/2491409 · DOI
- Ernst & Young Financial Reporting Group, 2013, International GAAP 2013: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles under International Financial Reporting Standards
- 10.1086/467038 · DOI
- Fitzsimons A. P., 2004, Bank Accounting & Finance, 17, 43
- 10.2307/2490879 · DOI
- 10.2307/2491306 · DOI
- 10.2307/2491424 · DOI
- 10.1080/00014788.2011.603206 · DOI
- 10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X · DOI · Paper page
- Kimmel P., 1993, Accounting Horizons, 7, 30
- Kimmel P., 1995, The Accounting Review, 70, 151
- 10.1016/j.intacc.2010.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-6281.2003.00134.x · DOI
- 10.2308/accr.2000.75.2.179 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1475-679x.2005.00168.x · DOI
- 10.1080/00014788.2011.623280 · DOI
- Patel A., 1993, Journal of Financial Research, 16, 181, 10.1111/j.1475-6803.1993.tb00139.x · DOI
- Paton W. A., 1922, Accounting Theory – with Special Reference to the Corporate Enterprise
- 10.2308/acch.2008.22.3.339 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1973.tb01356.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0361-3682(95)00015-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11156-007-0033-z · DOI
- 10.1016/S0361-3682(02)00016-8 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aos.2005.12.005 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Schmidt, M.
- Venue
- Accounting in Europe
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 201-222
- ISSN
- 1744-9480 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-9499
- OpenAlex
- W1990364340
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 31
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 3.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Accounting in Europe (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Accounting Theory and Financial Reporting
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Risk Management in Financial Firms
- Keywords
- IAS 32, hybrid financial instruments, IFRS adoption, accounting standard setting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Equity and Liabilities – A Discussion of IAS 32 and a Critique of the Classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17449480.2013.834727
- The paper
- Schmidt, M. (2013). Equity and Liabilities – A Discussion of IAS 32 and a Critique of the Classification. Accounting in Europe. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449480.2013.834727
