Cited by 2Youth Development and Social SupportMentoring and Academic DevelopmentPoverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Correlates of psychosocial outcomes among youth heads of households participating in mentoring programs: A study among Rwandan youths from Bugesera District

Mukabutera, Assumpta, Bizimana, Jean de Dieu, Owoeye, Olufemi, Nzayirambaho, Manassé·2013·Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies

Abstract

There is evidence that functioning as heads of household can negatively impact youth psychosocial well-being. We conducted a cross-sectional household survey among youth heads of household (YHH) participating in a mentoring program in one Rwandan district to examine associations between psychosocial outcomes (grief, marginalization, and depression) socioeconomic status, and quality of mentoring relationships. We collected data from 201 youths who have functioned as heads of household for 0–16 years (average: 5.3 years) and who lived with their younger siblings (64.4%) or other relatives (10.1%). We used classical linear regression models to explore variations in psychosocial outcomes due to participant characteristics and/or the quality of mentoring relationships. The results show that greater adult support (β = −0.2; SE = 0.076) and greater positive relationship with mentor (β = −1.7; SE = 0.882) were negatively associated with marginalization among YHH. Moreover, residing in Ngenda (β = 4.4; SE = 1.874) and being female (β = 2.8; SE = 0.126) were associated with higher levels of depressive symptoms, whereas greater support was associated with lower levels of depressive symptoms (β = −1.7; SE = 0.882). Our findings suggest that mentoring interventions may improve youth psychosocial well-being by emphasizing positive relationships between the mentor and their mentees in addition to providing adult support and material support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17450128.2012.708460

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Positive mentoring relationship reported by the mentees and assessed by aspects of happiness and understanding negatively predicted mentees' marginalization in a cross-sectional study conducted in a two-year mentoring program in Rwanda.

    “Positive mentoring relationship reported by the mentees and assessed by aspects of happiness and understanding negatively predicted mentees’ marginalization in a cross-sectional study conducted in a two-year mentoring program in Rwanda [60].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mukabutera, A., Bizimana, J. D. D., Owoeye, O., & Nzayirambaho, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Rwanda (RW)
  • World Bank (US)
  • World Vision International (GB)
Corresponding author
Bizimana, Jean de Dieu
Venue
Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies
Published
2013-03
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
49-59
ISSN
  • 1745-0128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-0136
OpenAlex
W2040287776
Cited by
2
References
28
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Keywords
mentoring programs, psychosocial well-being, grief, marginalization, depressive symptoms, adult support, socioeconomic status, gender differences, Bugesera District

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review