Cited by 34Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentYouth Development and Social SupportChild Welfare and Adoption

‘He told me to calm down and all that’: A qualitative study of forms of social support in youth mentoring relationships

Open access
Brady, Bernadine, Dolan, Pat, Canavan, John·2017·Child & Family Social Work

Abstract

Abstract The worldwide growth in formal youth mentoring programmes over the past two decades is partly a response to the perception that young people facing adversity do not have access to supportive relationships with adults and positive role models in their communities to the degree they once had. Formal mentoring programmes facilitate the development of a friendship or ‘match’ between an older volunteer and a young person, with the objective of supporting the young persons’ personal and social development. Drawing on 66 semi‐structured interviews with young people, parents, mentors and caseworkers associated with nine youth mentoring matches in theBigBrothersBigSistersProgramme inIreland, this paper analyses the forms of social support evident in the mentor–mentee relationships and highlights how the mentoring relationship was perceived to have impacted on the well‐being of the young people participating. The findings reflect the consensus in the mentoring literature that close, well‐established mentoring relationships have the potential to bring about meaningful change in the lives of young people.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/cfs.12235

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The promoting-catalyzing component encourages self-esteem, autonomy and self-direction, role modeling, guidance, advocacy, empowerment and challenge, future planning, and promoting motivation, and includes skill-based career and academic support.

    “The third component of promoting-catalyzing encourages self-esteem, autonomy and self-direction, role modeling, guidance, advocacy, empowerment and challenge, future planning, and promoting motivation. Other elements of this component include skill-based career and academic support [80,82,83,85,86,88,92,93,98,108].”
  • Three key active ingredients have been recognized in mentoring relationships: emotional, recreational, and promoting-catalyzing.

    “Three key active ingredients have been recognized: emotional, recreational, and promoting-catalyzing [82,83,84].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brady, B., Dolan, P., & Canavan, J.
Affiliations
UNESCO Child and Family Research Centre (IE)
Corresponding author
Brady, Bernadine
Venue
Child & Family Social Work
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-05-06
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
266-274
ISSN
  • 1356-7500 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2206
OpenAlex
W1930883038
Cited by
34
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Child & Family Social Work (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • University of Galway Research Repository (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Atlantic Philanthropies
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
Keywords
youth mentoring, social support, mentoring relationships, Big Brothers Big Sisters, youth well-being, role models, volunteer mentors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review