CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and PhysiologyPasture and Agricultural Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influence of rhaponticum carthamoides wild on the growth of ruminal bacteria in vitro and on fermentation in an artificial rumen (Rusitec)

Šelepcová, L., Jalč, D., Javorský, P., Baran, M.·1993·Archiv für Tierernaehrung
DOI 10.1080/17450399309386030
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The fermentation of a basal diet composed of hay and barley (80:20%) was compared with fermentation of three rations in which 5 and 10% of hay and 10% of basal diet were replaced with the above-ground part of Rhaponticum carthamoides Wild in an artificial rumen (Rusitec). Results of 14 days experiments indicated that the digestibility of dry matter, organic matter, detergent fibre, production of CO2 and methane, NH3-N in effluent and total and individual VFA (mmol/day) were not affected in the process of fermentation of experimental diets in comparison with the basal diet. Addition of Rhaponticum carthamoides did not modify the production, utilization and recovery of metabolic hydrogen, glucose utilization, ATP production, YATP and effectiveness of microbial biomass synthesis expressed in g of microbial N/kg of organic fermented biomass. Water extracts of Rhaponticum carthamoides had no influence on growth parameters of a mixed culture of rumen bacteria. Overall results of this experiment indicated that the above-ground part of Rhaponticum carthomoides fully replaced the 5 and 10% portions of hay or 10% portion of the whole diet.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17450399309386030

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Aliev A.A., 1986, Doklady Vaschnil, 11, 24
  2. Batajev V., 1981, Chimia Prir. Sojed., 16, 526
  3. Czerkawski J.W., 1968, Lab. Pract., 17, 994
  4. Demeyer, D.I. and Van Nevel, C.J. 1975. Proceedings of the IV‐th International Symposium on Ruminant Physiology. 1975, Sydney. pp.366
  5. Krasnov E.A., 1976, Chimia Prirod. Sojed., 550
  6. Mamatchanov A.V., 1979, Chimia Prirod. Sojed., 5, 667
  7. Mc Dougall E.I., 1948, Biochem. J., 43, 19
  8. Melnikova T.A., 1958, Aptečno delo, 7, 33
  9. Opletal L., 1990, Pokroky ve farmacii 10
  10. Sal'nikov B.J., 1964, Materiály teoretickej a klinickej mediciny, 4, 75
  11. Saratikov A.S., 1947, V. plenum UMS ministerstva zdravoochranenia RSFSR
  12. Saratikov A.S., 1970, Izv. SOAN SSSR, ser. biol. nauk, 88
  13. Syrov V.N., 1977, Dokl. Akad. Nauk XJz SSSR, 12, 27
  14. Šelepcová, L. and Baran, L. 1989.Scientific symposium on our animal production ČSSR, 104–105. Vysoké Tatry.
  15. Šelepcová L., 1989, Kandidätska dizertačna práca
  16. Šelepcová, L. 1990. 5th International Symposium Biological and technical intensification of production and increase of animal products quality. 1990, Nitra, Czechoslovakia. pp.24–25.
  17. Turova A.D., 1967, Lekarstvennyje rastenija, 67
  18. Vereskovskij V.V., 1977, Chimija Prirod. Sojed., 12, 578
  19. Vereskovskij V.V., 1979, Chimija Prirod. Sojed., 5, 723

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Šelepcová, L., Jalč, D., Javorský, P., & Baran, M.
Affiliations
  • Slovak Academy of Sciences (SK)
  • University of Veterinary Medicine in Košice (SK)
ORCID
Baran, M.
Venue
Archiv für Tierernaehrung
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1993-01
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
147-156
ISSN
0003-942X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1080/17450399309386030
OpenAlex
W1981846245
Cited by
4
References
10
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archiv für Tierernaehrung (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Pasture and Agricultural Systems
Keywords
Rhaponticum carthamoides, rumen bacteria, rumen fermentation, artificial rumen, RUSITEC, hay replacement, barley, volatile fatty acids, methane production, ammonia, microbial biomass, glucose utilization, ATP production, forage legumes, ruminant nutrition
MeSH terms
Ammonia, Animals, Animal Feed, Bacteria, Hordeum, Carbon Dioxide, Dietary Fiber, Digestion, Fatty Acids, Volatile, Fermentation, Poaceae, Methane, Plant Extracts, Plants, Medicinal, Rumen, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review