Cited by 64Computational Drug Discovery MethodsMachine Learning in Materials ScienceArtificial Intelligence Applications

Closed-loop discovery platform integration is needed for artificial intelligence to make an impact in drug discovery

Open access
Saikin, Semion K., Kreisbeck, Christoph, Sheberla, Dennis, Becker, Jill S., Aspuru-Guzik, Alán·2019·Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery

Abstract

The development of a new drug is an expensive process with estimated costs of US $1.5 billion which can take several years, even before extensive clinical or preclinical testing [1]. Early-stage dr...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17460441.2019.1546690

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The closed-loop approach does not need to create large libraries, rather employs agile experimental infrastructure, and statistics and ML to build QSAR-like models to predict the target properties for every element of the self-driving laboratory.

    “It does not need to create large libraries, rather employs agile experimental infrastructure, and statistics and ML to build QSAR-like models to predict the target properties for every element of the self-driving laboratory.167”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [167]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. • A comprehensive review of automation in the drug discovery.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Saikin, S. K., Kreisbeck, C., Sheberla, D., Becker, J. S., & Aspuru-Guzik, A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Kebotix (United States) (US)
  • Kebotix Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA
Corresponding author
Saikin, Semion K.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
Published
2018-11-29
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1-4
ISSN
  • 1746-0441 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-045X
OpenAlex
W2902568946
Cited by
63
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Tata Sons Limited - Alliance Agreement
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
artificial intelligence in drug discovery, early drug development
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Drug Development, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Drug Discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review