CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 18Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesQuantum many-body systems

Quantum Information and Computation for Chemistry

Open access
Olson, Jonathan, Cao, Yudong, Romero, Jonathan, Johnson, Peter, Dallaire-Demers, Pierre-Luc, Sawaya, Nicolas, Narang, Prineha, Kivlichan, Ian +2 more·2017·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.1706.05413arXiv 1706.05413
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The NSF Workshop in Quantum Information and Computation for Chemistry assembled experts from directly quantum-oriented fields such as algorithms, chemistry, machine learning, optics, simulation, and metrology, as well as experts in related fields such as condensed matter physics, biochemistry, physical chemistry, inorganic and organic chemistry, and spectroscopy. The goal of the workshop was to summarize recent progress in research at the interface of quantum information science and chemistry as well as to discuss the promising research challenges and opportunities in the field. Furthermore, the workshop hoped to identify target areas where cross fertilization among these fields would result in the largest payoff for developments in theory, algorithms, and experimental techniques. The ideas can be broadly categorized in two distinct areas of research that obviously have interactions and are not separated cleanly. The first area is quantum information for chemistry, or how quantum information tools, both experimental and theoretical can aid in our understanding of a wide range of problems pertaining to chemistry. The second area is chemistry for quantum information, which aims to discuss the several aspects where research in the chemical sciences can aid progress in quantum information science and technology. The results of the workshop are summarized in this report.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.1706.05413

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the long term, quantum simulation using quantum computers has great potential to wield a broad influence on the world.

    “In the long term, quantum simulation using quantum computers has great potential to wield a broad influence on the world [48, 49, 50].”

    From Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond (2018) · cites this paper as [50]

Cites

The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Olson, J., Cao, Y., Romero, J., Johnson, P., Dallaire-Demers, P.-L., Sawaya, N., Narang, P., Kivlichan, I., Wasielewski, M., & Aspuru-Guzik, A.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2017
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1706.05413
arXiv
1706.05413
OpenAlex
W4299397402
Cited by
15
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum information, quantum computing, quantum chemistry, quantum algorithms, quantum simulation, quantum metrology, quantum optics, machine learning in chemistry, spectroscopy, chemical physics, interdisciplinary research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review