Cited by 17Body Composition Measurement TechniquesErgonomics and Musculoskeletal DisordersFace recognition and analysis

Estimating somatotype from a single-camera 3D body scanning system

Open access
Chiu, Chuang‐Yuan, Ciems, Raimonds, Thelwell, Michael, Bullas, Alice, Choppin, Simon·2022·European Journal of Sport Science

Abstract

Somatotype is an approach to quantify body physique (shape and body composition). Somatotyping by manual measurement (the anthropometric method) or visual rating (the photoscopic method) needs technical expertize to minimize intra‐ and inter‐observer errors. This study aims to develop machine learning models which enable automatic estimation of Heath‐Carter somatotypes using a single‐camera 3D scanning system. Single‐camera 3D scanning was used to obtain 3D imaging data and computer vision techniques to extract features of body shape. Machine learning models were developed to predict participants' somatotypes from the extracted shape features. These predicted somatotypes were compared against manual measurement procedures. Data were collected from 46 participants and used as the training/validation set for model developing, whilst data collected from 17 participants were used as the test set for model evaluation. Evaluation tests showed that the 3D scanning methods enable accurate (mean error < 0.5; intraclass correlation coefficients >0.8) and precise (test‐retest root mean square error < 0.5; intraclass correlation coefficients >0.8) somatotype predictions. This study shows that the 3D scanning methods could be used as an alternative to traditional somatotyping approaches after the current models improve with the large datasets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17461391.2021.1921041

Cites

32 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hume, P. A., Sheerin, K. R., &amp; de Ridder, J. H. (2018). Nonimaging method: Surface anthropometry. In P. A. Hume, D. A. Kerr, &amp; T. R. Ackland (Eds.), Best practice protocols for physique assessment in sport (pp. 61 -70). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
  2. Biology of Sport , 1 (1), 19 -26. PubMed. doi:10.5114/biolsport. 2017.63382 · DOI
  3. Newcombe, R. A., Izadi, S., Hilliges, O., Molyneaux, D., Kim, D., Davison, A. J., … Fitzgibbon, A. (2011). KinectFusion: Realtime dense surface mapping and tracking. 2011 10th IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality , 127 -136.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiu, C., Ciems, R., Thelwell, M., Bullas, A., & Choppin, S.
Affiliations
  • Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
  • Hawk‐eye Innovations Ltd. Basingstoke UK
Corresponding author
Chiu, Chuang‐Yuan
Venue
European Journal of Sport Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-16
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
1204-1210
ISSN
  • 1536-7290 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-1391
OpenAlex
W3157355763
Cited by
17
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Sport Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SHURA (Sheffield Hallam University Research Archive) (Sheffield Hallam University) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Sheffield Hallam University (NA)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
somatotype, Heath-Carter somatotype, 3D body scanning, body shape, body composition, computer vision, shape feature extraction, machine learning prediction, anthropometry, test-retest reliability
MeSH terms
Anthropometry, Body Composition, Humans, Somatotypes, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review