Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Serum iron availability, but not iron stores, is lower in naturally menstruating than in oral contraceptive athletes

Alfaro‐Magallanes, Víctor M., Romero‐Parra, Nuria, Barba‐Moreno, Laura, Rael, Beatriz, Benito, Pedro J., Díaz, Ángel E., Cupeiro, Rocío, Peinado, Ana B., IronFEMME Study Group·2023·European Journal of Sport Science

Abstract

This study measured serum markers of iron status in naturally menstruating and oral contraceptive (OC) athletes during the main hormonal milieus of these two profiles to identify potential differences confounding the diagnosis of iron deficiency in female athletes. Resting blood samples were collected from 36 naturally menstruating athletes during the early‐follicular phase (EFP), mid‐ late‐follicular phase (MLFP) and mid‐luteal phase (MLP) of the menstrual cycle. Simultaneously, blood samples were collected from 24 OC athletes during the withdrawal and active‐pill phase of the OC cycle. Serum iron, ferritin, transferrin, transferrin saturation (TSAT), C‐reactive protein (CRP), interleukin‐6 and sex hormones were analyzed. Naturally menstruating athletes showed lower levels of TSAT, iron and transferrin than OC athletes when comparing the bleeding phase of both profiles (p<0.05) as well as when comparing all analyzed phases of the menstrual cycle to the active pill phase of the OC cycle (p<0.05). Interestingly, only lower transferrin was found during MLFP and MLP compared to the withdrawal phase of the OC cycle (p>0.05), with all other iron markers showing no differences (p>0.05). Intracycle variations were also found within both types of cycle, presenting reduced TSAT and iron during menstrual bleeding phases (p<0.05). In conclusion, in OC athletes, serum iron availability, but not serum ferritin, seems higher than in naturally menstruating ones. However, such differences are lost when comparing the MLFP and MLP of the menstrual cycle with the withdrawal phase of the OC cycle. This should be considered in the assessment of iron status in female athletes. Highlights Naturally menstruating athletes present lower TSAT, iron and transferrin in all analyzed phases of the menstrual cycle compared to OC athletes during their active pill phase. However, both the mid‐late follicular and mid‐luteal phases of the menstrual cycle do not differ from the withdrawal phase of the oral contraceptive cycle. Intracycle variations are found for TSAT and iron in both naturally menstruating and oral contraceptive athletes, which are mainly driven by a reduction in TSAT and iron during menstrual bleeding phases. As serum iron availability changes significantly as a function of the athlete's hormonal status, it should be considered in the assessment of the athlete's iron status as well as standardise the phase of the menstrual cycle in which to assess iron markers to avoid misdiagnosis or misleading results. In contrast, the assessment of iron stores through serum ferritin is substantially stable and the athlete's hormonal status does not seem to be of relevance for this purpose.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17461391.2021.2018503

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. 10.1111/sms.13894 · DOI
  2. 10.1080/02640414.2021.1885782 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Barba‐Moreno L. Alfaro‐Magallanes V. Calderón F. &Peinado A.(10.18176/archmeddeporte.0009 · DOI
  4. Barba‐Moreno L. Alfaro‐Magallanes V. M. Janse de Jonge X. A. K. Díaz A. E. Cupeiro R. &Peinado A. B.(10.1080/17461391.2020.1853816 · DOI
  5. 10.1079/BJN20051461 · DOI
  6. 10.3109/13625187.2012.677076 · DOI
  7. 10.3324/haematol.2019.232124 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.contraception.2007.04.016 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/07315724.2017.1318317 · DOI
  10. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  11. 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.05.017 · DOI
  12. 10.3109/13625187.2010.513071 · DOI
  13. 10.3109/0886022X.2010.502609 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.11.023 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/ejc.7.2.79.90 · DOI
  16. 10.1093/ajcn/41.4.703 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101052 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1139/apnm‐2014‐0147 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1093/ajcn/58.5.705 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/0010‐7824(92)90095‐B · DOI
  21. 10.1007/BF01698138 · DOI
  22. 10.1182/hematology.2019000034 · DOI
  23. 10.14814/phy2.12820 · DOI
  24. 10.1371/journal.pone.0093002 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.3390/ijerph18020735 · DOI
  26. 10.1123/ijspp.2016‐0689 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.11.008 · DOI
  28. 10.1159/000465530 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.bone.2020.115495 · DOI
  30. 10.1067/mhj.2000.106646 · DOI · Paper page
  31. 10.1152/ajpregu.00014.2021 · DOI

Cited by

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Alfaro‐Magallanes, V. M., Romero‐Parra, N., Barba‐Moreno, L., Rael, B., Benito, P. J., Díaz, Á. E., Cupeiro, R., Peinado, A. B., & IronFEMME Study Group
Venue
European Journal of Sport Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2022-01-06
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
231-240
ISSN
  • 1746-1391
  • 1536-7290
Cited by
12
References
10
Language
en
Funders
  • Universidad Politécnica de Madrid
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (DEP2016-75387-P)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.