Cited by 382Menstrual Health and DisordersSports Performance and TrainingHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Methodological Recommendations for Menstrual Cycle Research in Sports and Exercise

JANSE DE JONGE, XANNE, THOMPSON, BELINDA, HAN, AHREUM·2019·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this review is to provide methodological recommendations for menstrual cycle research in exercise science and sports medicine based on a review of recent literature. Research in this area is growing but often reports conflicting results, and it is proposed that some of this may be explained by methodological issues. Methods: This review examined the menstrual cycle verification methods used in recent literature on exercise performance over the menstrual cycle identified through a literature search of PubMed and SportDiscus from 2008 until 2018. Results: Potential changes over the menstrual cycle are likely related to hormone fluctuations; however, only 44% of the selected studies measured the actual concentrations of the female steroid hormones estrogen and progesterone. It was shown that the likely inclusion of participants with anovulatory or luteal phase–deficient cycles in combination with small participant numbers has affected results in recent menstrual cycle research and, consequently, our understanding of this area. Conclusion: To improve the quality of future menstrual cycle research, it is recommended that a combination of three methods is used to verify menstrual cycle phase: the calendar-based counting method combined with urinary luteinizing hormone surge testing and the measurement of serum estrogen and progesterone concentrations at the time of testing. A strict luteal phase verification limit of >16 nmol·L −1 for progesterone should be set. It is also recommended that future research should focus on the inclusion of the late follicular estrogen peak. It is envisaged that these methodological recommendations will assist in clarifying some of the disagreement around the effects of the menstrual cycle on exercise performance and other aspects of exercise science and sports medicine.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1249/mss.0000000000002073

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
JANSE DE JONGE, X., THOMPSON, B., & HAN, A.
Affiliations
  • Faculty of Science, The University of Newcastle, Ourimbah, AUSTRALIA
  • University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
2019-07-26
Volume
51
Issue
12
Pages
2610-2617
ISSN
  • 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-0315
OpenAlex
W2955148740
Cited by
382
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 83 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 6
FWCI
4.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
menstrual cycle, exercise performance, estrogen, progesterone, luteinizing hormone surge, luteal phase, anovulation, follicular phase
MeSH terms
Body Temperature, Estrogens, Female, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Menstrual Cycle, Progesterone, Research Design, Saliva, Sports, Exercise, Athletic Performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review