Cited by 83

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Do People Have Insight into their Face Recognition Abilities?

Palermo, Romina, Rossion, Bruno, Rhodes, Gillian, Laguesse, Renaud, Tez, Tolga, Hall, Bronwyn, Albonico, Andrea, Malaspina, Manuela, Daini, Roberta, Irons, Jessica, Al-Janabi, Shahd, Taylor, Libby C., Rivolta, Davide, McKone, Elinor·2017·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

Diagnosis of developmental or congenital prosopagnosia (CP) involves self-report of everyday face recognition difficulties, which are corroborated with poor performance on behavioural tests. This approach requires accurate self-evaluation. We examine the extent to which typical adults have insight into their face recognition abilities across four experiments involving nearly 300 participants. The experiments used five tests of face recognition ability: two that tap into the ability to learn and recognize previously unfamiliar faces [the Cambridge Face Memory Test, CFMT; Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 576–585. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001; and a newly devised test based on the CFMT but where the study phases involve watching short movies rather than viewing static faces—the CFMT-Films] and three that tap face matching [Benton Facial Recognition Test, BFRT; Benton, A., Sivan, A., Hamsher, K., Varney, N., & Spreen, O. (1983). Contribution to neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; and two recently devised sequential face matching tests]. Self-reported ability was measured with the 15-item Kennerknecht et al. questionnaire [Kennerknecht, I., Ho, N. Y., & Wong, V. C. (2008). Prevalence of hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA) in Hong Kong Chinese population. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 146A(22), 2863–2870. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32552]; two single-item questions assessing face recognition ability; and a new 77-item meta-cognition questionnaire. Overall, we find that adults with typical face recognition abilities have only modest insight into their ability to recognize faces on behavioural tests. In a fifth experiment, we assess self-reported face recognition ability in people with CP and find that some people who expect to perform poorly on behavioural tests of face recognition do indeed perform poorly. However, it is not yet clear whether individuals within this group of poor performers have greater levels of insight (i.e., into their degree of impairment) than those with more typical levels of performance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17470218.2016.1161058

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People have very little insight into their own face identification ability.

    “In general, people have very little insight into their own face identification ability [31–34]”

    From Do professional facial image comparison training courses work? (2019) · cites this paper as [32]

    The supplied passage gives the paper’s title and authors, but no finding about how accurately people judge their own face-identification ability. Searches for poor insight and for relationships between self-rated and measured face-recognition ability returned only bibliographic material or no matching passage, so the claim cannot be verified from the available passages. (LLM, conf=0.68)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.015 · DOI
  2. 10.1093/brain/awp252 · DOI
  3. Bate S., 2014, Psychology Review, 19, 18
  4. 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.006 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.02.004 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/a0022106 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.011 · DOI
  8. Benton A., 1983, Contribution to neuropsychological assessment
  9. 10.1080/23311908.2014.986903 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/02643290903343149 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.21 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559053.013.0015 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.017 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.004 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.018 · DOI
  16. 10.1098/rstb.1992.0012 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/wcs.1374 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028800 · DOI
  19. 10.1076/jcen.21.3.312.917 · DOI
  20. 10.1076/jcen.21.3.312.917 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10.008 · DOI
  22. 10.3758/s13428-011-0160-2 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/02643290701380491 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/02643291003616145 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001 · DOI
  26. 10.1212/01.WNL.0000118297.03161.B3 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/02643299008253437 · DOI
  28. 10.1167/14.8.7 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70502-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1371/journal.pone.0094013 · DOI
  31. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.840 · DOI
  32. 10.1080/09658210902976969 · DOI
  33. Kaplan R. M., 2001, Psychological testing: Principles, applications and issues
  34. 10.1002/ajmg.a.31343 · DOI
  35. 10.1002/ajmg.a.32552 · DOI
  36. 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.023 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.014 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/02643294.2011.616880 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1073/pnas.1000567107 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/02643294.2012.744740 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.039 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.021 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00131-X · DOI
  46. Raven J.C., 2008, Standard progressive matrices: Plus version and mill hill vocabulary scale
  47. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.016 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/s11065-012-9223-0 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/brain/awg241 · DOI
  50. 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.3.543 · DOI
  51. 10.1068/p6270 · DOI
  52. 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1435 · DOI
  53. 10.3758/PBR.16.2.252 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Shah P., 2015, Royal Society Open Science, 2, 1
  55. 10.1371/journal.pone.0015702.g005 · DOI
  56. 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.011 · DOI
  57. 10.1037/a0033469 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.004 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/nn.2224 · DOI
  60. 10.3758/s13428-015-0637-5 · DOI
  61. 10.1080/02643294.2012.753433 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1073/pnas.0913053107 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.03.013 · DOI
  64. 10.1177/1745691613518075 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Palermo, R., Rossion, B., Rhodes, G., Laguesse, R., Tez, T., Hall, B., Albonico, A., Malaspina, M., Daini, R., Irons, J., Al-Janabi, S., Taylor, L. C., Rivolta, D., & McKone, E.
Affiliations
  • ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders
  • Institute of Psychology (IPSY), Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
  • Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
  • Psychology Department, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca and NeuroMI–Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milan, Italy
  • Department of Cognitive Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2017-02
Volume
70
Issue
2
Pages
218-233
ISSN
  • 1747-0218
  • 1747-0226
Cited by
83
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • Australian Research Council (DP0877379,DP0984558,DP110100850,DP130102300)
  • Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council (CE110001021)
  • European Research Council (facessvep 284025)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review