The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do People Have Insight into their Face Recognition Abilities?
Abstract
Diagnosis of developmental or congenital prosopagnosia (CP) involves self-report of everyday face recognition difficulties, which are corroborated with poor performance on behavioural tests. This approach requires accurate self-evaluation. We examine the extent to which typical adults have insight into their face recognition abilities across four experiments involving nearly 300 participants. The experiments used five tests of face recognition ability: two that tap into the ability to learn and recognize previously unfamiliar faces [the Cambridge Face Memory Test, CFMT; Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 576–585. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001; and a newly devised test based on the CFMT but where the study phases involve watching short movies rather than viewing static faces—the CFMT-Films] and three that tap face matching [Benton Facial Recognition Test, BFRT; Benton, A., Sivan, A., Hamsher, K., Varney, N., & Spreen, O. (1983). Contribution to neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press; and two recently devised sequential face matching tests]. Self-reported ability was measured with the 15-item Kennerknecht et al. questionnaire [Kennerknecht, I., Ho, N. Y., & Wong, V. C. (2008). Prevalence of hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA) in Hong Kong Chinese population. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 146A(22), 2863–2870. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.32552]; two single-item questions assessing face recognition ability; and a new 77-item meta-cognition questionnaire. Overall, we find that adults with typical face recognition abilities have only modest insight into their ability to recognize faces on behavioural tests. In a fifth experiment, we assess self-reported face recognition ability in people with CP and find that some people who expect to perform poorly on behavioural tests of face recognition do indeed perform poorly. However, it is not yet clear whether individuals within this group of poor performers have greater levels of insight (i.e., into their degree of impairment) than those with more typical levels of performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People have very little insight into their own face identification ability.
“In general, people have very little insight into their own face identification ability [31–34]”
From Do professional facial image comparison training courses work? (2019) · cites this paper as [32]
The supplied passage gives the paper’s title and authors, but no finding about how accurately people judge their own face-identification ability. Searches for poor insight and for relationships between self-rated and measured face-recognition ability returned only bibliographic material or no matching passage, so the claim cannot be verified from the available passages. (LLM, conf=0.68)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1023/a:1005653411471 · Cited by 6,450 · cited 4×
“The Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS; Mattick & Clarke, 1998), which measures self-reported levels of social anxiety, and the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ; Baron-Cohen et al., 2001), which measures selfreported levels of autistic traits, were also included.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSlade, T., Johnston, A., Teesson, M., Whiteford, H., Burgess, P., Pirkis, J., & Saw, S. (2009) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e676562010-001 · Cited by 313 · cited 1×
“This rate of 31% is higher than that of the Australian population reporting any anxiety disorder (14.4%; Slade et al., 2009).”
ResultInfluential
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 64
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.015 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awp252 · DOI
- Bate S., 2014, Psychology Review, 19, 18
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2013.08.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.02.004 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0022106 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.011 · DOI
- Benton A., 1983, Contribution to neuropsychological assessment
- 10.1080/23311908.2014.986903 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02643290903343149 · DOI
- 10.1037/1040-3590.9.1.21 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199559053.013.0015 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.07.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.01.018 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1992.0012 · DOI
- 10.1002/wcs.1374 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0028800 · DOI
- 10.1076/jcen.21.3.312.917 · DOI
- 10.1076/jcen.21.3.312.917 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.10.008 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13428-011-0160-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/02643290701380491 · DOI
- 10.1080/02643291003616145 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001 · DOI
- 10.1212/01.WNL.0000118297.03161.B3 · DOI
- 10.1080/02643299008253437 · DOI
- 10.1167/14.8.7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70502-1 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0094013 · DOI
- 10.3758/BRM.40.3.840 · DOI
- 10.1080/09658210902976969 · DOI
- Kaplan R. M., 2001, Psychological testing: Principles, applications and issues
- 10.1002/ajmg.a.31343 · DOI
- 10.1002/ajmg.a.32552 · DOI
- 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.023 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.visres.2012.07.014 · DOI
- 10.1080/02643294.2011.616880 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1000567107 · DOI
- 10.1080/02643294.2012.744740 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.039 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.02.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00131-X · DOI
- Raven J.C., 2008, Standard progressive matrices: Plus version and mill hill vocabulary scale
- 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.08.016 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11065-012-9223-0 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awg241 · DOI
- 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.3.543 · DOI
- 10.1068/p6270 · DOI
- 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.9.1435 · DOI
- 10.3758/PBR.16.2.252 · DOI · Paper page
- Shah P., 2015, Royal Society Open Science, 2, 1
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0015702.g005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.conb.2012.12.011 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0033469 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.004 · DOI
- 10.1038/nn.2224 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13428-015-0637-5 · DOI
- 10.1080/02643294.2012.753433 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.0913053107 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.03.013 · DOI
- 10.1177/1745691613518075 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Do professional facial image comparison training courses work?
Towler, A., Kemp, R. I., Burton, A. M., Dunn, J. D., Wayne, T., Moreton, R., & White, D. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211037 · Cited by 111
Metadata
- Authors
- Palermo, R., Rossion, B., Rhodes, G., Laguesse, R., Tez, T., Hall, B., Albonico, A., Malaspina, M., Daini, R., Irons, J., Al-Janabi, S., Taylor, L. C., Rivolta, D., & McKone, E.
- Affiliations
- ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders
- Institute of Psychology (IPSY), Université Catholique de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
- Research School of Psychology, The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
- Psychology Department, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca and NeuroMI–Milan Center for Neuroscience, Milan, Italy
- Department of Cognitive Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-02
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 218-233
- ISSN
- 1747-0218
- 1747-0226
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Australian Research Council (DP0877379,DP0984558,DP110100850,DP130102300)
- Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders, Australian Research Council (CE110001021)
- European Research Council (facessvep 284025)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review