The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies show that some people perform very well in face matching tasks while others perform very poorly, and that these individual differences are stable across tests.
“This would be consistent with previous studies showing that some people perform very well in face matching tasks while others perform very poorly [15, 33, 34] and that these individual differences are stable across tests [33–35].”
From Error Rates in Users of Automatic Face Recognition Software (2015) · cites this paper as [34]
Super-recognizers are being deployed.
“and the deployment of super-recognizers [135,136]”
From Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions (2021) · cites this paper as [136]
All SRs had obtained scores that surpassed those of control participants by at least 1.96 SDs on two tests of face recognition: the CFMT+ and the Models Memory Test.
“All SRs had obtained scores that surpassed those of control participants by at least 1.96 SDs (norms were taken from Bate et al., 2018) on two tests of face recognition: the extended form of the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT+: Russell et al., 2009) and the Models Memory Test (Bate et al., 2018).”
From Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls (2020) · cites this paper as Russell et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Barton, J. J. S., Cherkasova, M. V., Press, D. Z., Intriligator, J. M., & O’Connor, M. (2003). Developmental prosopagnosia: A study of three patients. Brain & Cognition, 51, 12–30. · DOI
- Behrmann, M., & Avidan, G. (2005). Congenital prosopagnosia: Face-blind from birth. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 180–187. · DOI
- de Gelder, B., & Rouw, R. (2000). Configural face processes in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence for two separate face systems? NeuroReport, 11, 3145–3150. · DOI
- Duchaine, B., Germine, L., & Nakayama, K. (2007). Family resemblance: Ten family members with prosopagnosia and within-class object agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24, 419–430. · DOI
- Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006a). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted performance and prosopagnosic subjects. Neuropsychologia, 44, 576–585. · DOI
- Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006b). Developmental prosopagnosia: A window to content-specific face processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16, 166–173. · DOI
- Duchaine, B., Yovel, G., Butterworth, E. J., & Nakayama, K. (2006). Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms: Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in a developmental case. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 714–747. · DOI
- Kennerknecht, I., Grueter, T., Welling, B., Wentzek, S., Horst, J., Edwards, S., & Grueter, M. (2006). First report of prevalence of syndromic hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA). American Journal of Medical Genetics, 140A, 1617–1622. · DOI
- Kress, T., & Daum, I. (2003). Event-related potentials reflect impaired face recognition in patients with congenital prosopagnosia. Neuroscience Letters, 352, 133–136. · DOI
- Le Grand, R., Cooper, P. A., Mondloch, C. J., Lewis, T. L., Sagiv, N., de Gelder, B., & Maurer, D. (2006). What aspects of face processing are impaired in developmental prosopagnosia? Brain & Cognition, 61, 139–158. · DOI
- McConachie, H. R. (1976). Developmental prosopagnosia: A single case report. Cortex, 12, 76–82. · DOI
- Megreya, A. M., & Burton, A. M. (2006). Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory & Cognition, 34, 865–876. · DOI · Paper page
- Morgan, C. A., III, Hazlett, G., Baranoski, M., Doran, A., Southwick, S., & Loftus, E. (2007). Accuracy of eyewitness identification is significantly associated with performance on a standardized test of face recognition. International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 30, 213–223. · DOI
- Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 277–295. · DOI
- Wilhelm, O., Herzmann, G., Kunina, O., & Sommer, W. (2007). Face cognition: A set of distinct mental abilities. Available from Nature Precedings at http://hdl.handle.net/10101/npre.2007.1385.1.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Face recognition accuracy of forensic examiners, superrecognizers, and face recognition algorithms
Phillips, P. J., Yates, A. N., Hu, Y., Hahn, C. A., Noyes, E., Jackson, K., Cavazos, J. G., Jeckeln, G., Ranjan, R., Sankaranarayanan, S., et al. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1721355115 · Cited by 461
Skuse, D. H., Lori, A., Cubells, J. F., Lee, I., Conneely, K. N., Puura, K., Lehtimäki, T., Binder, E. B., & Young, L. J. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1302985111 · Cited by 207
Error Rates in Users of Automatic Face Recognition Software
White, D., Dunn, J. D., Schmid, A. C., & Kemp, R. I. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0139827 · Cited by 141
The eyes test as a measure of individual differences: how much of the variance reflects verbal IQ?
Peterson, E., & Miller, S. F. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00220 · Cited by 129
Scherf, K. S., Elbich, D., Minshew, N., & Behrmann, M. (2015) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.11.003 · Cited by 53
Forensic Facial Comparison: Current Status, Limitations, and Future Directions
Bacci, N., Davimes, J. G., Steyn, M., & Briers, N. (2021) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology10121269 · Cited by 26
Unfamiliar face matching with photographs of infants and children
Kramer, R. S. S., Mulgrew, J., & Reynolds, M. G. (2018) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.5010 · Cited by 15
Enhanced Matching of Children’s Faces in “Super-Recognisers” But Not High-Contact Controls
Bate, S., Bennetts, R., Murray, E., & Portch, E. (2020) · i-Perception · doi:10.1177/2041669520944420 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, R., Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K.
- Venue
- Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 252-257
- ISSN
- 1069-9384
- 1531-5320
- PMC
- PMC3904192
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
