Cited by 40Respiratory Support and MechanismsObstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchAirway Management and Intubation Techniques

The right interface for the right patient in noninvasive ventilation: a systematic review

Open access
Pierucci, Paola, Portacci, Andrea, Carpagnano, Giovanna Elisiana, Banfi, Paolo, Crimi, Claudia, Misseri, Giovanni, Gregoretti, Cesare·2022·Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Research in the field of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has contributed to the development of new NIV interfaces. However, interface tolerance plays a crucial role in determining the beneficial effects of NIV therapy. AREAS COVERED: This systematic review explores the most significant scientific research on NIV interfaces, with a focus on the potential impact that their design might have on treatment adherence and clinical outcomes. The rationale on the choice of the right interface among the wide variety of devices that are currently available is discussed here. EXPERT OPINION: The paradigm 'The right mask for the right patient' seems to be difficult to achieve in real life. Ranging from acute to chronic settings, the gold standard should include the tailoring of NIV interfaces to patients' needs and preferences. However, such customization may be hampered by issues of economic nature. High production costs and the increasing demand represent consistent burdens and have to be considered when dealing with patient-tailored NIV interfaces. New research focusing on developing advanced and tailored NIV masks should be prioritized; indeed, interfaces should be designed according to the specific patient and clinical setting where they need to be used.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17476348.2022.2121706

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One major problem with continuous use of non-invasive ventilation is interface intolerance or lack of interface rotational strategy, which may lead to emergency tracheotomy.

    “One of the major problem with the continuous use of the NIV is interface intolerance or lack of interface rotational strategy which may lead to emergency tracheotomy [50].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pierucci, P., Portacci, A., Carpagnano, G. E., Banfi, P., Crimi, C., Misseri, G., & Gregoretti, C.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Consorziale - Policlinico Bari (IT)
  • Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico "G.Rodolico - San Marco" (IT)
  • Fondazione Istituto G. Giglio di Cefalù (IT)
Corresponding author
Pierucci, Paola
Venue
Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine
Published
2022-08-03
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
931-944
ISSN
  • 1747-6348 (ISSN-L)
  • 1747-6356
OpenAlex
W4295260825
Cited by
40
References
132
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Expert Review of Respiratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Airway Management and Intubation Techniques
Keywords
non-invasive ventilation, masks, medication adherence, mask design, economic burden, chronic respiratory failure, acute respiratory failure
MeSH terms
Humans, Masks, Respiration, Artificial, Noninvasive Ventilation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review