Cited by 6Nursing care and researchCOVID-19 and Mental HealthTracheal and airway disorders

Caregivers of Neuromuscular Patients Living with Tracheostomy during COVID-19 Pandemic: Their Experience

Open access
Pierucci, Paola, Volpato, Eleonora, Grosso, Francesca, De Candia, Maria, Casparrini, Massimo, Compalati, Elena, Pagnini, Francesco, Banfi, Paolo +1 more·2023·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Background: During a pandemic, tracheostomy management in neuromuscular disease (NMD) patients can be complex. Methods: Using a multicentre, multiple case study approach, we sought perspectives through semi-structured interviews via hybrid quali-quantitative analysis. The qualitative analysis involved a semi-structured interview and the quantitative analysis the completion of a battery of questionnaires. Aim: To investigate the caregivers’ experiences, burden and beliefs regarding tracheostomy during the Italian COVID-19 pandemic. The following instruments were administered: Connor and Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC-25); Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II (AAQ-II); State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI); Langer Mindfulness Scale (LMS); Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI). Results: Fifty-three caregivers (62.3% female, mean age 52.2 (SD = 18.2)) participated in the study. The more resilient the carers, the more they were psychologically flexible (r = 0.380, p = 0.014) and able to cope adaptively with the emergency (r = 0.378, p < 0.006). Similarly, perceived control was higher the more resilient they were (r = 0.897, p < 0.001). The main emotions emerging were isolation and loneliness (15; 34.88%). The perception of tracheostomy meant that it could be seen as a lifesaver or as a condemnation. Similarly, the relationship with health professionals moves from satisfaction to a feeling of abandonment over the course of the pandemic. Conclusions: These findings offer a unique opportunity to understand the point of view of caregivers of NMD patients living with tracheotomy during the COVID-19 pandemic, when going to the hospital may have been hampered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm12020555

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The COVID-19 pandemic created unprecedented challenges for clinical care and research in neuromuscular disease and chronic respiratory failure patients on home invasive mechanical ventilation, who often felt abandoned.

    “The COVID-19 pandemic has created unprecedented challenges for clinical care and research in NMD and CRF in HIMV who often have been feeling abandoned [20, 21], an aspect also found in caregivers [22].”
  • Reduced access to in-person support and healthcare services, as well as increased social isolation, may contribute to these feelings.

    “Reduced access to in-person support and healthcare services, as well as increased social isolation, may contribute to these feelings [22, 55].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [20]Eatough V. Smith A. Interpretative phenomenological analysis The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology SAGE Publications Ltd. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA 2008 179 195
  2. [21]Smith J. Flowers P. Larkin M. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis SAGE Publications Ltd. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pierucci, P., Volpato, E., Grosso, F., De Candia, M., Casparrini, M., Compalati, E., Pagnini, F., Banfi, P., & Carpagnano, G.
Affiliations
  • Azienda Universitaria Ospedaliera Consorziale - Policlinico Bari (IT)
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • Cardiothoracic Department, Respiratory and Critical Care Unit Bari Policlinic University Hospital, 70121 Bari, Italy
  • Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation (IT)
Corresponding author
Pierucci, Paola
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-01-10
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
555
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4315491986
Cited by
6
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Tracheal and airway disorders
Keywords
tracheostomy, neuromuscular disorders, caregiver burden, caregiver experiences, COVID-19 pandemic, caregiver resilience, psychological flexibility, perceived control, loneliness, caregiver isolation, tracheostomy management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review