Cited by 519Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsAssistive Technology in Communication and MobilityMuscle activation and electromyography studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics

Biddiss, Elaine, Beaton, Dorcas, Chau, Tom·2007·Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology

DOI 10.1080/17483100701714733

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure consumer satisfaction with upper limb prosthetics and provide an enumerated list of design priorities for future developments. METHODS: A self-administered, anonymous survey collected information on participant demographics, history of and goals for prosthesis use, satisfaction, and design priorities. The questionnaire was available online and in paper format and was distributed through healthcare providers, community support groups, and one prosthesis manufacturer; 242 participants of all ages and levels of upper limb absence completed the survey. RESULTS: Rates of rejection for myoelectric hands, passive hands, and body-powered hooks were 39%, 53%, and 50%, respectively. Prosthesis wearers were generally satisfied with their devices while prosthesis rejecters were dissatisfied. Reduced prosthesis weight emerged as the highest priority design concern of consumers. Lower cost ranked within the top five design priorities for adult wearers of all device types. Life-like appearance is a priority for passive/cosmetic prostheses, while improved harness comfort, wrist movement, grip control and strength are required for body-powered devices. Glove durability, lack of sensory feedback, and poor dexterity were also identified as design priorities for electric devices. CONCLUSIONS: Design priorities reflect consumer goals for prosthesis use and vary depending on the type of prosthesis used and age. Future design efforts should focus on the development of more light-weight, comfortable prostheses.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17483100701714733

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The measurement of satisfaction with healthcare: implications for practice from a systematic review of the literature
Crow, R. A., Gage, H., Hampson, S., Hart, J., Kimber, A., Storey, L., & Thomas, H. (2002) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta6320 · Cited by 1,267
Upper limb prosthesis use and abandonment
Biddiss, E. A., & Chau, T. T. (2007) · Prosthetics and Orthotics International · doi:10.1080/03093640600994581 · Cited by 1,123
Self-citation
A Gaussian Mixture Model Based Classification Scheme for Myoelectric Control of Powered Upper Limb Prostheses
Huang, Y., Englehart, K. B., Hudgins, B., & Chan, A. D. C. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2005.856295 · Cited by 641
Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm
Dhillon, G. S., & Horch, K. W. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.856072 · Cited by 573
Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities
Atkins, D. J., Heard, D. C. Y., & Donovan, W. H. (1996) · JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics · doi:10.1097/00008526-199600810-00003 · Cited by 517
Internet Versus Mailed Questionnaires: A Randomized Comparison
Ritter, P., Lorig, K., Laurent, D., & Matthews, K. (2004) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.6.3.e29 · Cited by 427 · cited 1×
“With some exceptions [44], response rates are generally lower for emailed surveys than for conventional methods [29].”
Background
A heuristic fuzzy logic approach to EMG pattern recognition for multifunctional prosthesis control
Ajiboye, A. B., & Weir, R. F. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2005.847357 · Cited by 415
Gender and the Internet*
Ono, H., & Madeline Zavodny, B. (2003) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1540-6237.t01-1-8401007 · Cited by 397
The SPRING Hand: Development of a Self-Adaptive Prosthesis for Restoring Natural Grasping
Carrozza, M. C., Suppo, C., Sebastiani, F., Massa, B., Vecchi, F., Lazzarini, R., Cutkosky, M. R., & Dario, P. (2004) · Autonomous Robots · doi:10.1023/b:auro.0000016863.48502.98 · Cited by 255
A survey of the satisfaction of upper limb amputees with their prostheses, their lifestyles, and their abilities
Davidson, J. (2002) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1053/hanthe.2002.v15.01562 · Cited by 200

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

Crow R, 2002, Health Tech Assess [serial online], 6
Kyberd P, 1998, J Prosthet Orthot [serial online], 10
Crandall R C, 2002, J Pediatr Orthop, 22, 380
Berke G M, 1991, J Prosthet Orthot [serial online], 3
Hubbard S, 1997, The limb deficient child, 417
Biddiss E, Prosthet Orthot Int
Lake C, 2003, J Prosthet Orthot [serial online], 15

Sorted by citations

Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin
Chortos, A., Liu, J., & Bao, Z. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4671 · Cited by 2,396
Restoring natural sensory feedback in real-time bidirectional hand prostheses
Raspopovic, S., Capogrosso, M., Petrini, F. M., Bonizzato, M., Rigosa, J., Di Pino, G., Carpaneto, J., Controzzi, M., Boretius, T., Fernandez, E., et al. (2014) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3006820 · Cited by 1,001
Literature Review on Needs of Upper Limb Prosthesis Users
Cordella, F., Ciancio, A. L., Sacchetti, R., Davalli, A., Cutti, A. G., Guglielmelli, E., & Zollo, L. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00209 · Cited by 766
Mechanical design and performance specifications of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands: A review
Belter, J. T., Segil, J. L., Dollar, A. M., & Weir, R. F. F. (2013) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2011.10.0188 · Cited by 721
A brain-computer interface that evokes tactile sensations improves robotic arm control
Flesher, S. N., Downey, J. E., Weiss, J. M., Hughes, C. L., Herrera, A. J., Tyler-Kabara, E. C., Boninger, M. L., Collinger, J. L., & Gaunt, R. A. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abd0380 · Cited by 617
Sensory feedback in upper limb prosthetics
Antfolk, C., D’Alonzo, M., Rosén, B., Lundborg, G., Sebelius, F., & Cipriani, C. (2013) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/erd.12.68 · Cited by 466
A Review of Intent Detection, Arbitration, and Communication Aspects of Shared Control for Physical Human–Robot Interaction
Losey, D. P., McDonald, C. G., Battaglia, E., & O’Malley, M. K. (2018) · Applied Mechanics Reviews · doi:10.1115/1.4039145 · Cited by 424
Sensory feedback for limb prostheses in amputees
Raspopovic, S., Valle, G., & Petrini, F. M. (2021) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/s41563-021-00966-9 · Cited by 308
Advanced Upper Limb Prosthetic Devices: Implications for Upper Limb Prosthetic Rehabilitation
Resnik, L., Meucci, M. R., Lieberman-Klinger, S., Fantini, C., Kelty, D. L., Disla, R., & Sasson, N. (2012) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.010 · Cited by 280
Toward higher-performance bionic limbs for wider clinical use
Farina, D., Vujaklija, I., Brånemark, R., Bull, A. M. J., Dietl, H., Graimann, B., Hargrove, L. J., Hoffmann, K.-P., Huang, H., Ingvarsson, T., et al. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-021-00732-x · Cited by 263
Prosthetic Myoelectric Control Strategies: A Clinical Perspective
Roche, A. D., Rehbaum, H., Farina, D., & Aszmann, O. C. (2014) · Current Surgery Reports · doi:10.1007/s40137-013-0044-8 · Cited by 271
Sensory feedback by peripheral nerve stimulation improves task performance in individuals with upper limb loss using a myoelectric prosthesis
Schiefer, M., Tan, D., Sidek, S. M., & Tyler, D. J. (2016) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/13/1/016001 · Cited by 255
Haptic wearables as sensory replacement, sensory augmentation and trainer – a review
Shull, P. B., & Damian, D. D. (2015) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0055-z · Cited by 245
Prosthesis rejection in acquired major upper-limb amputees: a population-based survey
Østlie, K., Lesjø, I. M., Franklin, R. J., Garfelt, B., Skjeldal, O. H., & Magnus, P. M. (2011) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2011.635405 · Cited by 240
A Review of Sensory Feedback in Upper-Limb Prostheses From the Perspective of Human Motor Control
Sensinger, J. W., & Dosen, S. S. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00345 · Cited by 252
Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: systematic literature review
Carey, S. L., Lura, D. J., Highsmith, M. J., CP, & FAAOP (2015) · Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2014.08.0192 · Cited by 227
Unilateral upper-limb loss: Satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts
McFarland, L. V., Winkler, S., Heinemann, A. W., Jones, M., & Esquenazi, A. (2010) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2009.03.0027 · Cited by 225
Home Use of a Neural-connected Sensory Prosthesis Provides the Functional and Psychosocial Experience of Having a Hand Again
Graczyk, E. L., Resnik, L. J., Schiefer, M. A., Schmitt, M. S., & Tyler, D. J. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26952-x · Cited by 214
Artificial Neuron Devices
He, K., Wang, C., He, Y., Su, J., & Chen, X. (2023) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00527 · Cited by 202
Comfort and function remain key factors in upper limb prosthetic abandonment: findings of a scoping review
Smail, L. C., Neal, C., Wilkins, C., & Packham, T. (2020) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1738567 · Cited by 201
Artificial Redirection of Sensation From Prosthetic Fingers to the Phantom Hand Map on Transradial Amputees: Vibrotactile Versus Mechanotactile Sensory Feedback
Antfolk, C., D’Alonzo, M., Controzzi, M., Lundborg, G., Rosén, B., Sebelius, F., & Cipriani, C. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2012.2217989 · Cited by 194
A review of invasive and non-invasive sensory feedback in upper limb prostheses
Svensson, P., Wijk, U., Björkman, A., & Antfolk, C. (2017) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2017.1332989 · Cited by 192
Implementation of 3D Printing Technology in the Field of Prosthetics: Past, Present, and Future
Manero, A. C., SMITH, P. A. S., Sparkman, J., Dombrowski, M., Courbin, D., Kester, A., Womack, I., & Chi, A. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16091641 · Cited by 191
Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques
Engdahl, S. M., Christie, B. P., Kelly, B. M., Davis, A. J., Chestek, C. A., & Gates, D. H. (2015) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-015-0044-2 · Cited by 177
Stability and selectivity of a chronic, multi-contact cuff electrode for sensory stimulation in human amputees
Tan, D. W., Schiefer, M. A., Keith, M. W., Anderson, J. R., & Tyler, D. J. (2015) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/12/2/026002 · Cited by 175
A Miniature Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution Device for Multifingered Hand Prosthetics
Cipriani, C., D’Alonzo, M., & Carrozza, M. C. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2011.2173342 · Cited by 164
Performance characteristics of anthropomorphic prosthetic hands
Belter, J. T., & Dollar, A. M. (2011) · International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics · doi:10.1109/icorr.2011.5975476 · Cited by 163
Robotic hand: A review on linkage-driven finger mechanisms of prosthetic hands and evaluation of the performance criteria
Kashef, S. R., Amini, S., & Akbarzadeh, A. (2019) · Mechanism and Machine Theory · doi:10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.103677 · Cited by 161
Applications of sensory feedback in motorized upper extremity prosthesis: a review
Schofield, J. S., Evans, K. R., Carey, J. P., & Hebert, J. S. (2014) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1586/17434440.2014.929496 · Cited by 157
Adaptive Sliding Mode Control for Prosthetic Hands to Simultaneously Prevent Slip and Minimize Deformation of Grasped Objects
Engeberg, E. D., & Meek, S. G. (2012) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2011.2179061 · Cited by 147
Novel Targeted Sensory Reinnervation Technique to Restore Functional Hand Sensation After Transhumeral Amputation
Hebert, J. S., Olson, J. L., Morhart, M. J., Dawson, M. R. W., Marasco, P. D., Kuiken, T., & Chan, K. M. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2013.2294907 · Cited by 146
Force Myography to Control Robotic Upper Extremity Prostheses: A Feasibility Study
Cho, E., Chen, R. J., Merhi, L.-K., Xiao, Z. G., Pousett, B. M., & Menon, C. (2016) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2016.00018 · Cited by 143
Roughness Encoding for Discrimination of Surfaces in Artificial Active-Touch
Oddo, C. M., Controzzi, M., Beccai, L., Cipriani, C., & Carrozza, M. C. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics · doi:10.1109/tro.2011.2116930 · Cited by 143
Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life
Østlie, K., Lesjø, I. M., Franklin, R. J., Garfelt, B., Skjeldal, O. H., & Magnus, P. M. (2012) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2011.653296 · Cited by 135
The clinical relevance of advanced artificial feedback in the control of a multi-functional myoelectric prosthesis
Marković, M., Schweisfurth, M. A., Engels, L. F., Bentz, T., Wüstefeld, D., Farina, D., & Dosen, S. S. (2018) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0371-1 · Cited by 142
Control of prosthetic hands via the peripheral nervous system
Ciancio, A. L., Cordella, F., Barone, R., Romeo, R. A., Bellingegni, A. D., Sacchetti, R., Davalli, A., Di Pino, G., Ranieri, F., Di Lazzaro, V., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2016.00116 · Cited by 131
Real-time simultaneous and proportional myoelectric control using intramuscular EMG
Smith, L. H., Kuiken, T., & Hargrove, L. J. (2014) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2560/11/6/066013 · Cited by 134
Development and Control of a Multifunctional Prosthetic Hand with Shape Memory Alloy Actuators
Andrianesis, K., & Tzes, A. P. (2014) · Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems · doi:10.1007/s10846-014-0061-6 · Cited by 127
Behavioral Demonstration of a Somatosensory Neuroprosthesis
Berg, J. A., Dammann, J. F., Tenore, F. V., Tabot, G. A., Boback, J. L., Manfredi, L. R., Peterson, M. L., Katyal, K. D., Johannes, M. S., Makhlin, A., et al. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2013.2244616 · Cited by 119
Forearm amputees' views of prosthesis use and sensory feedback
Wijk, U., & Carlsson, I. (2015) · Journal of Hand Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.jht.2015.01.013 · Cited by 114
A Method for the Control of Multigrasp Myoelectric Prosthetic Hands
Dalley, S. A., Varol, H. A., & Goldfarb, M. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2011.2175488 · Cited by 113
Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on air-mediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin
Antfolk, C., Björkman, A., Frank, S., Sebelius, F., Lundborg, G., & Rosén, B. (2012) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/16501977-1001 · Cited by 113
A national study of Veterans with major upper limb amputation: Survey methods, participants, and summary findings
Resnik, L. J., Ekerholm, S., Borgia, M. L., & Clark, M. A. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213578 · Cited by 112
Active upper limb prostheses: a review on current state and upcoming breakthroughs
Marinelli, A., Boccardo, N., Tessari, F., Domenico, D. D., Caserta, G., Canepa, M., Gini, G. C., Barresi, G., Laffranchi, M., Michieli, L. D., et al. (2022) · Progress in Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1088/2516-1091/acac57 · Cited by 123
A Review of Myoelectric Control for Prosthetic Hand Manipulation
Chen, Z., Min, H., Wang, D., Xia, Z., Sun, F., & Fang, B. (2023) · Biomimetics · doi:10.3390/biomimetics8030328 · Cited by 110
Sensory restoration by epidural stimulation of the lateral spinal cord in upper-limb amputees
Chandrasekaran, S., Nanivadekar, A. C., McKernan, G., Helm, E. R., Boninger, M. L., Collinger, J. L., Gaunt, R. A., & Fisher, L. E. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.54349 · Cited by 111
Passive prosthetic hands and tools
Maat, B., Smit, G., Plettenburg, D. H., & Breedveld, P. (2017) · Prosthetics and Orthotics International · doi:10.1177/0309364617691622 · Cited by 107
A machine learning‐assisted multifunctional tactile sensor for smart prosthetics
Li, Y., Yang, L., Deng, S., Huang, H., Wang, Y., Xiong, Z., Feng, S., Wang, S., Li, T., & Zhang, T. (2023) · InfoMat · doi:10.1002/inf2.12463 · Cited by 109
Neural interfaces for somatosensory feedback: bringing life to a prosthesis
Tyler, D. J. (2015) · Current Opinion in Neurology · doi:10.1097/wco.0000000000000266 · Cited by 105
Tact: Design and performance of an open-source, affordable, myoelectric prosthetic hand
Slade, P., Akhtar, A., Nguyen, M., & Bretl, T. W. (2015) · Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation/Proceedings · doi:10.1109/icra.2015.7140105 · Cited by 105
Vibrotactile Stimulation Promotes Embodiment of an Alien Hand in Amputees With Phantom Sensations
D’Alonzo, M., Clemente, F., & Cipriani, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2014.2337952 · Cited by 112
Intraneural sensory feedback restores grip force control and motor coordination while using a prosthetic hand
Clemente, F., Valle, G., Controzzi, M., Strauss, I., Iberite, F., Stieglitz, T., Granata, G., Rossini, P. M., Petrini, F. M., Micera, S., et al. (2019) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/ab059b · Cited by 106
Case-study of a user-driven prosthetic arm design: bionic hand versus customized body-powered technology in a highly demanding work environment
Schweitzer, W., Thali, M. J., & Egger, D. (2018) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-017-0340-0 · Cited by 98
The RIC Arm—A Small Anthropomorphic Transhumeral Prosthesis
Lenzi, T., Lipsey, J. H., & Sensinger, J. W. (2016) · IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics · doi:10.1109/tmech.2016.2596104 · Cited by 92
Design and Evaluation of a Bowden-Cable-Based Remote Actuation System for Wearable Robotics
Hofmann, U., Bützer, T., Lambercy, O., & Gassert, R. (2018) · IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters · doi:10.1109/lra.2018.2809625 · Cited by 92
The SoftHand Pro: Functional evaluation of a novel, flexible, and robust myoelectric prosthesis
Godfrey, S. B., Zhao, K. D., Theuer, A. B., Catalano, M. G., Bianchi, M., Breighner, R. E., Bhaskaran, D., Lennon, R. J., Grioli, G., Santello, M., et al. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205653 · Cited by 89
Users’ and therapists’ perceptions of myoelectric multi-function upper limb prostheses with conventional and pattern recognition control
Franzke, A. W., Kristoffersen, M., Bongers, R. M., Murgia, A., Pobatschnig, B., Unglaube, F., & van der Sluis, C. K. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220899 · Cited by 96
Impact of Michelangelo prosthetic hand: Findings from a crossover longitudinal study
Luchetti, M., Cutti, A. G., Verni, G., Sacchetti, R., & Rossi, N. C. F. (2015) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2014.11.0283 · Cited by 89
Selectivity and Longevity of Peripheral-Nerve and Machine Interfaces: A Review.
Ghafoor, U., Kim, S., & Hong, K.-S. (2017) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2017.00059 · Cited by 88
“Fifty percent of users do still prefer body-powered prostheses, possibly for improved feedback or referred sensation (Biddiss et al., 2007).”
Restoring tactile and proprioceptive sensation through a brain interface
Tabot, G. A., Kim, S. S., Winberry, J. E., & Bensmaia, S. J. (2015) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2014.08.029 · Cited by 83
Gaussian Process Autoregression for Simultaneous Proportional Multi-Modal Prosthetic Control With Natural Hand Kinematics
Xiloyannis, M., Gavriel, C., Thomik, A. A. C., & Faisal, A. A. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2017.2699598 · Cited by 83
Direct Electrical Stimulation in Electrocorticographic Brain–Computer Interfaces: Enabling Technologies for Input to Cortex
Caldwell, D. J., Ojemann, J. G., & Rao, R. P. N. (2019) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2019.00804 · Cited by 81
HapPro: A Wearable Haptic Device for Proprioceptive Feedback
Rossi, M., Bianchi, M., Battaglia, E., Catalano, M. G., & Bicchi, A. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2018.2836672 · Cited by 80
Knit Band Sensor for Myoelectric Control of Surface EMG-Based Prosthetic Hand
Lee, S., Kim, M.-O., Kang, T., Park, J., & Choi, Y. (2018) · IEEE Sensors Journal · doi:10.1109/jsen.2018.2865623 · Cited by 78
The Rice Haptic Rocker: Skin stretch haptic feedback with the Pisa/IIT SoftHand
Battaglia, E., Clark, J. P., Bianchi, M., Catalano, M. G., Bicchi, A., & O’Malley, M. K. (2017) · IEEE World Haptics Conference (WHC) · doi:10.1109/whc.2017.7989848 · Cited by 76
A System for Electrotactile Feedback Using Electronic Skin and Flexible Matrix Electrodes: Experimental Evaluation
Franceschi, M., Seminara, L., Dosen, S. S., Strbac, M. D., Valle, M., & Farina, D. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Haptics · doi:10.1109/toh.2016.2618377 · Cited by 83
User demands for sensory feedback in upper extremity prostheses
Lewis, S., Russold, M., Dietl, H., & Kaniušas, E. (2012) · IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) · doi:10.1109/memea.2012.6226669 · Cited by 70
User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results
Kerver, N., van Twillert, S., Maas, B., & van der Sluis, C. K. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234342 · Cited by 69
Task-Specific somatosensory feedback via cortical stimulation in humans
Cronin, J. A., Wu, J., Collins, K. L., Sarma, D., Rao, R. P. N., Ojemann, J. G., & Olson, J. D. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Haptics · doi:10.1109/toh.2016.2591952 · Cited by 68
Efficiency of voluntary opening hand and hook prosthetic devices: 24 years of development?
Smit, G., Bongers, R. M., van der Sluis, C. K., & Plettenburg, D. H. (2012) · The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development · doi:10.1682/jrrd.2011.07.0125 · Cited by 67
Motor-commands decoding using peripheral nerve signals: a review
Hong, K.-S., Aziz, N., & Ghafoor, U. (2018) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aab383 · Cited by 63
Need for mechanically and ergonomically enhanced tremor-suppression orthoses for the upper limb: a systematic review
Fromme, N. P., Camenzind, M., Riener, R., & Rossi, R. (2019) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-019-0543-7 · Cited by 56
The Lightweight Delft Cylinder Hand: First Multi-Articulating Hand That Meets the Basic User Requirements
Smit, G., Plettenburg, D. H., & van der Helm, F. C. T. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2014.2342158 · Cited by 62
Repeated Training with Augmentative Vibrotactile Feedback Increases Object Manipulation Performance
Stepp, C. E., An, Q., & Matsuoka, Y. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032743 · Cited by 65
Skin Stretch Haptic Feedback to Convey Closure Information in Anthropomorphic, Under-Actuated Upper Limb Soft Prostheses
Battaglia, E., Clark, J. P., Bianchi, M., Catalano, M. G., Bicchi, A., & O’Malley, M. K. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Haptics · doi:10.1109/toh.2019.2915075 · Cited by 60
Novel differential mechanism enabling two DOF from a single actuator: Application to a prosthetic hand
Belter, J. T., & Dollar, A. M. (2013) · International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics · doi:10.1109/icorr.2013.6650441 · Cited by 60
The benefits of sensation on the experience of a hand: A qualitative case series
Graczyk, E. L., Gill, A., Tyler, D. J., & Resnik, L. J. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0211469 · Cited by 63
Investigating Limiting Factors in Stretchable All-Carbon Transistors for Reliable Stretchable Electronics
Chortos, A., Zhu, C., Oh, J. Y., Yan, X., Pochorovski, I., To, J. W. F., Liu, N., Kraft, U., Murmann, B., & Bao, Z. (2017) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.7b02458 · Cited by 59
An Analysis of Usability Evaluation Practices and Contexts of Use in Wearable Robotics
Meyer, J. T., Gassert, R., & Lambercy, O. (2021) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-021-00963-8 · Cited by 58
3D-Printing and Upper-Limb Prosthetic Sockets: Promises and Pitfalls
Olsen, J., Day, S. J., Dupan, S. S. G., Nazarpour, K., & Dyson, M. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2021.3057984 · Cited by 57
Flexible and static wrist units in upper limb prosthesis users: functionality scores, user satisfaction and compensatory movements
Deijs, M., Bongers, R. M., van Leusen, N. D. M. R. , & van der Sluis, C. K. (2016) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-016-0130-0 · Cited by 57
Design of a High-Speed Prosthetic Finger Driven by Peano-HASEL Actuators
Yoder, Z., Kellaris, N., Chase-Markopoulou, C., Ricken, D., Mitchell, S. K., Emmett, M. B., Weir, R. F. F., Segil, J. L., & Keplinger, C. (2020) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.586216 · Cited by 56
3D printing and amputation: a scoping review
Ribeiro, D., Cimino, S. R., Mayo, A. L., Ratto, M., & Hitzig, S. L. (2019) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.1080/17483107.2019.1646825 · Cited by 55
Transfer of tactile input from an artificial hand to the forearm: experiments in amputees and able-bodied volunteers
Antfolk, C., Cipriani, C., Carrozza, M. C., Balkenius, C., Björkman, A., Lundborg, G., Rosén, B., & Sebelius, F. (2012) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2012.713435 · Cited by 53
Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience
Resnik, L. J., Klinger, S. L., Etter, K., & Fantini, C. M. (2013) · Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology · doi:10.3109/17483107.2013.822024 · Cited by 52
Broadband Prosthetic Interfaces: Combining Nerve Transfers and Implantable Multichannel EMG Technology to Decode Spinal Motor Neuron Activity
Bergmeister, K. D., Vujaklija, I., Muceli, S., Sturma, A., Hruby, L. A., Prahm, C., Riedl, O., Salminger, S., Manzano-Szalai, K., Aman, M., et al. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00421 · Cited by 52
Illusory Sense of Human Touch From a Warm and Soft Artificial Hand
Cabibihan, J., Joshi, D., Srinivasa, Y. M., Chan, M. A., & Muruganantham, A. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2014.2360533 · Cited by 52
Mechatronics – More questions than answers
Bradley, D. (2010) · Mechatronics · doi:10.1016/j.mechatronics.2010.07.011 · Cited by 51
GLIMPSE: Google Glass interface for sensory feedback in myoelectric hand prostheses
Marković, M., Karnal, H., Graimann, B., Farina, D., & Dosen, S. S. (2017) · Journal of Neural Engineering · doi:10.1088/1741-2552/aa620a · Cited by 50
Metal muscles and nerves—a self-sensing SMA-actuated hand concept
Simone, F., Rizzello, G., & Seelecke, S. S. (2017) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/1361-665x/aa7ad5 · Cited by 50
Satisfaction with cosmesis and priorities for cosmesis design reported by lower limb amputees in the United Kingdom
Cairns, N., Murray, K., Corney, J., & McFadyen, A. K. (2013) · Prosthetics and Orthotics International · doi:10.1177/0309364613512149 · Cited by 49
Real-time simulation of hand motion for prosthesis control
Blana, D., Chadwick, E. K., van den Bogert, A. J., & Murray, W. M. (2016) · Computer Methods in Biomechanics & Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1080/10255842.2016.1255943 · Cited by 49
Human Machine Interfaces in Upper-Limb Prosthesis Control: A Survey of Techniques for Preprocessing and Processing of Biosignals
Ahmadizadeh, C., Khoshnam, M., & Menon, C. (2021) · IEEE Signal Processing Magazine · doi:10.1109/msp.2021.3057042 · Cited by 48
Intent Prediction Based on Biomechanical Coordination of EMG and Vision-Filtered Gaze for End-Point Control of an Arm Prosthesis
Krausz, N. E., Lamotte, D., Batzianoulis, I., Hargrove, L. J., Micera, S., & Billard, A. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2020.2992885 · Cited by 46
Remote Actuation Systems for Fully Wearable Assistive Devices: Requirements, Selection, and Optimization for Out-of-the-Lab Application of a Hand Exoskeleton
Dittli, J., Hofmann, U., Bützer, T., Smit, G., Lambercy, O., & Gassert, R. (2021) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2020.596185 · Cited by 46
Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution for Object Manipulation: Amplitude Versus Pulse Train Frequency Modulation
Stepp, C. E., & Matsuoka, Y. (2011) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2011.2170856 · Cited by 48
Sensory Feedback in Hand Prostheses: A Prospective Study of Everyday Use
Wijk, U., Carlsson, I. K., Antfolk, C., Björkman, A., & Rosén, B. (2020) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2020.00663 · Cited by 45
Survey of transfemoral amputee experience and priorities for the user-centered design of powered robotic transfemoral prostheses
Fanciullacci, C., McKinney, Z., Monaco, V., Milandri, G. S., Davalli, A., Sacchetti, R., Laffranchi, M., Michieli, L. D., Baldoni, A., Mazzoni, A., et al. (2021) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-021-00944-x · Cited by 45
Multichannel haptic feedback unlocks prosthetic hand dexterity
Abd, M. A., Ingicco, J., Hutchinson, D. T., Tognoli, E., & Engeberg, E. D. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-04953-1 · Cited by 45
The SoftHand Pro-H: A Hybrid Body-Controlled, Electrically Powered Hand Prosthesis for Daily Living and Working
Piazza, C., Catalano, M. G., Godfrey, S. B., Rossi, M., Grioli, G., Bianchi, M., Zhao, K. D., & Bicchi, A. (2017) · IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine · doi:10.1109/mra.2017.2751662 · Cited by 44

Authors: Biddiss, E., Beaton, D., & Chau, T.
Affiliations: University of Toronto (CA)
Institute for Work & Health (CA)
Corresponding author: Chau, Tom
ORCID: Biddiss, Elaine
Beaton, Dorcas
Chau, Tom
Venue: Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
Published: 2007-01
Volume: 2
Issue: 6
Pages: 346-357
ISSN: 1748-3107 (ISSN-L)
1748-3115
DOI: 10.1080/17483100701714733
OpenAlex: W2051230789
Cited by: 519
References: 48
Citations by year: 2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 21
FWCI: 3.59
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Locations: Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
Keywords: upper limb prosthesis, customer satisfaction, design priorities, myoelectric hand, prosthesis rejection, prosthesis weight, prosthesis cost, grip control, sensory feedback, glove durability, dexterity, age differences
MeSH terms: Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Artificial Limbs, Child, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Patient Satisfaction, Upper Extremity, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Consumer design priorities for upper limb prosthetics

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks