Cited by 252Social Work Education and PracticeEthics in Business and EducationEthics in medical practice

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Everyday ethics in professional life: social work as ethics work

Open access
Banks, Sarah·2016·Ethics and Social Welfare

Abstract

This article outlines and develops the concept of ‘ethics work’ in social work practice. It takes as its starting point a situated account of ethics as embedded in everyday practice: ‘everyday ethics’. This is contrasted with ‘textbook ethics’, which focuses on outlining general ethical principles, presenting ethical dilemmas and offering normative ethical frameworks (including decision-making models). ‘Ethics work’ is a more descriptive account of ethics that refers to the effort people put into seeing ethically salient aspects of situations, developing themselves as good practitioners, working out the right course of action and justifying who they are and what they have done. After identifying seven features of ethics work, including work on framing, roles, emotion, identity, reason, relationships and performance, each element is illustrated with reference to two case examples from social work practice. It is argued that the concept of ethics work, with its focus on the practitioners as moral agents in context, is an important antidote to the rules-based managerialism of much contemporary practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17496535.2015.1126623

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Appiah K. A., 2008, Experiments in Ethics
  2. Aristotle, 1954, The Nichomachean Ethics of Aristotle.
  3. 10.1515/9781400846320 · DOI
  4. Banks S., 2004, Ethics, Accountability and the Social Professions, 10.1007/978-1-137-11536-2 · DOI
  5. 10.1093/bjsw/bcn099 · DOI
  6. Banks S., 2009, Ethics and Social Welfare, 3, 55
  7. 10.18352/jsi.260 · DOI
  8. Banks S., 2012, Ethics and Values in Social Work, 10.1007/978-0-230-37592-5 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/13691457.2012.732931 · DOI
  10. Banks S., 2014, Ethics, 1
  11. Banks S., 2009, Ethics in Professional Life: Virtues for Health and Social Care, 10.1007/978-1-137-07769-1 · DOI
  12. Banks S., 2012, Practising Social Work Ethics Around the World: Cases and Commentaries
  13. 10.1093/bjsw/bch199 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1080/17496535.2010.484265 · DOI
  15. Beauchamp T., 2009, Principles of Biomedical Ethics
  16. 10.1146/annurev.soc.26.1.611 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1017/CBO9780511624605 · DOI
  18. Bondi L., 2011, Towards Professional Wisdom: Practical Deliberation in the People Professions
  19. Edmonds D., 2014, Would You Kill the Fat Man? The Trolley Problem and What Your Answer Tells Us about Right and Wrong
  20. Foucault M., 2000, Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth: The Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984, 1, 281
  21. Foucault M., 2000, Ethics: Subjectivity and truth: The Essential Works of Foucault 1954–184, 1, 253
  22. 10.17763/haer.47.4.g6167429416hg5l0 · DOI
  23. Goffman E., 1969, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life
  24. Goffman E., 1974, Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organisation of Experience
  25. Goldie P., 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
  26. Haidt J., 2013, The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
  27. Halford S., 1999, Professionals and the New Managerialism in the Public Sector, 102
  28. Hall C., 2014, Language Practices in Social Work: Discourse in Practice
  29. Hall C., 1997, The Construction of Professional Discourse, 265
  30. Hall C, 2006, Language Practices in Social Work: Categorisation and accountability in child welfare
  31. Hauser M., 2006, Moral Minds: How Nature Designed our Universal Sense of Right and Wrong
  32. Held V., 2006, The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global
  33. Hochschild A., 1983, The Managed Heart: Commercialisation of Human Feeling
  34. Hochschild A., 2003, The Commercialisation of Intimate Life: Notes from Home and Work, 10.1525/9780520935167 · DOI
  35. Hugman R., 2005, New Approaches in Ethics for the Caring Professions, 10.1057/978-0-230-21170-4 · DOI
  36. Kahneman D., 2011, Thinking, Fast and Slow
  37. Kahneman D., 1981, Science, 221, 453
  38. 10.1093/bjsw/bcu057 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/17496535.2013.774040 · DOI
  40. 10.1080/17496531003608154 · DOI
  41. Kline R., 2012, Professional Accountability in Social Care and Health: Challenging Unacceptable Practice and its Management
  42. 10.1080/17496535.2010.484255 · DOI
  43. 10.1111/j.1365-2206.2010.00704.x · DOI
  44. Levy N., 2008, American Journal of Bioethics, 2, 3
  45. 10.1093/bjsw/32.8.1015 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1136/jme.2006.018580 · DOI
  47. 10.1017/CBO9780511487118 · DOI
  48. Richland J., 2010, Ordinary Ethics; Anthropology, Language and Action, 249
  49. Sacks H., 1992, Lectures on Conversation (edited by G. Jefferson)
  50. Schön D., 1994, Frame Reflection: Toward the Resolution of Intractable Policy Controversies
  51. 10.1016/S0260-6917(96)80092-X · DOI
  52. Smith P., 2012, The Emotional Labour of Nursing Revisited: Can Nurses Still Care?, 10.1007/978-0-230-35631-3 · DOI
  53. 10.1177/00187267035610001 · DOI
  54. 10.1093/0199253889.001.0001 · DOI
  55. Tascón S., 2010, Ethics and Value Perspectives in Social Work, 85, 10.1007/978-0-230-31357-6_8 · DOI
  56. Taylor C., 2006, Critical Reflection in Health and Social Care Maidenhead, 73
  57. Taylor C., 2000, Practising Reflexivity in Health and Welfare
  58. Toulmin S., 2001, Return to Reason
  59. Tronto J., 1993, Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care
  60. 10.1080/17496535.2012.704058 · DOI
  61. Vetlesen A., 1994, Perception, Empathy and Judgment: An Inquiry into the Preconditions of Moral Performance
  62. Walker M., 2007, Moral Understandings: A Feminist Study in Ethics
  63. Watson T., 2007, Organisation, 15, 121
  64. 10.1007/s10728-010-0165-5 · DOI
  65. 10.1080/10428231003781774 · DOI
  66. 10.1177/0957926513508855 · DOI
  67. Wooffitt R., 2005, Conversation Analysis and Discourse Analysis: A Comparative and Critical Introduction, 10.4135/9781849208765 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Banks, S.
Affiliations
Durham University (GB)
Corresponding author
Banks, Sarah
Venue
Ethics and Social Welfare
Published
2016-01-02
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
35-52
ISSN
  • 1749-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1749-6543
OpenAlex
W2234888738
Cited by
252
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5
FWCI
36.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Ethics and Social Welfare (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
everyday ethics, social work practice, moral agency, professional identity, ethical decision-making, managerialism, ethical dilemmas, practitioner role, professional relationships

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review