The DOI matches its Crossref record; 68 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Developing rigor in qualitative research: problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology
Open accessAbstract
Qualitative research has grown within sport and exercise psychology and is now widely conducted. The purpose of this review is to discuss three commonly used ways to demonstrate rigor when conducting or judging qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology. These are the method of member checking, the method of inter-rater reliability, and the notion of universal criteria. Problems with each method are first highlighted. Member checking and inter-rater reliability are shown to be ineffective for verification, trustworthiness, or reliability purposes. Next, universal criteria within the context of Tracy’s, heavily drawn on paper within sport and exercise psychology is problematized. Throughout the discussion of each method and universal criteria more suitable possibilities for conducting rigorous qualitative research are offered. The paper concludes that to support high-quality qualitative research, scholars – including journal editors and reviewers – need to change how rigor is developed and judged, rather than perpetuate the problems with how it has been commonly evaluated in the past. Recommendations for developing rigor when conducting and/or judging qualitative research within sport and exercise psychology are also offered.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This practice in theory controls for or corrects any subjective bias-misinterpretation, misemphasis-of the researcher (Smith & McGannon, 2018).”
From Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher (2023) · cites this paper as Smith & McGannon, 2018
In the citing paper
“However, the use of member checking is infused with assumptions about reality and knowledge production that sit (conceptually) uncomfortably with reflexive TA-including that there is a truth of participants' experiences that we can access if we can keep the potentially distorting effects of researcher influence in check (see Smith & McGannon, 2018).”
From Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher (2023) · cites this paper as Smith & McGannon, 2018
In the citing paper
“Luckily, qualitative methodologists have already done a lot of the heavy lifting here (e.g., Braun & Clarke, 2021b;Smith & McGannon, 2018;Varpio et al., 2017Varpio et al., , 2021)), presenting thoughtful considerations of what's assumed and at stake in various supposedly universal criteria.”
From Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher (2023) · cites this paper as Smith & McGannon, 2018
Citations
Cites
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · Cited by 45,787
Handbook of qualitative research
Griffin, T. F. (1999) · Psychology and Marketing · doi:10.1002/(sici)1520-6793(199907)16:4 · Cited by 9,061
Qualitative Quality: Eight “Big-Tent” Criteria for Excellent Qualitative Research
Tracy, S. J. (2010) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1077800410383121 · Cited by 7,536 · cited 16×
“One possibility is to reframe member checking as member reflections (Braun & Clarke, 2013; Tracy, 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluential(2014) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446294406.n148 · Cited by 7,272
InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing
Flinders, D. J. (1997) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/s0149-7189(97)89858-8 · Cited by 7,236
Successful Qualitative Research: A practical guide for beginners
Jamieson, J., Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2014) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2014.1.18.39 · Cited by 6,673
Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences.
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005) · Cited by 6,640
Neufeld, A., & Ryan, A. G. (1988) · Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation · doi:10.3138/cjpe.3.006 · Cited by 5,906
The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research[1]
(2006) · Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management An International Journal · doi:10.1108/17465640610666642 · Cited by 5,866
Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners
(2016) · QMiP Bulletin · doi:10.53841/bpsqmip.2016.1.21.48 · Cited by 4,033
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- Burke S., 2016, Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise, 330
- Gergen K., 2009, Relational being
- Gibson K., 2016, Routledge handbook of qualitative research methods in sport and exercise, 382
- Holt N. L., 2016, Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise, 24
- Kay T., 2016, Routledge handbook of qualitative research methods in sport and exercise, 424
- Knight C. J., 2016, Routledge handbook of qualitative research methods in sport and exercise, 409
- Palmer C., 2016, Routledge handbook of qualitative research methods in sport and exercise, 316
- Smith B., 2015, Ethnographies in sport and exercise, 59
- 10.4324/9781315762012 · DOI
- 10.4324/9781315762012 · DOI
- Smith J., 2005, Handbook of qualitative research, 915
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,001 of 1,001
Saint-Martin (2020) · Journal of Physical Education and Sport · doi:10.7752/jpes.2020.06481 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Birmingham (GB)
- Laurentian University (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Smith, Brett
- Venue
- International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-05-14
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 101-121
- ISSN
- 1750-984X (ISSN-L)
- 1750-9858
- OpenAlex
- W2615715350
- Cited by
- 3,074
- References
- 69
- Citations by year
- 2026: 358 · 2025: 418 · 2024: 394 · 2023: 395 · 2022: 365 · 2021: 396 · 2020: 299 · 2019: 227 · 2018: 161 · 2017: 61
- FWCI
- 728.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Keywords
- qualitative research rigor, member checking, inter-rater reliability, trustworthiness, research evaluation, peer review, editorial practice, sport and exercise psychology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
