The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
One for the team: understanding individual and collaborative pursuits of script development across competing discourses
Abstract
Drawing on interviews from industry professionals, this article explores both the collaborative and, less documented, individual manifestations of script development. Researchers have noted that within screenwriting and screen production, script development practices and processes defy definition over various modes, media, global contexts and production cultures. This article argues that part of this flux is the ways in which individual pursuits of script development are mis/understood and/or dismissed. Screenwriting scholarship often questions the discourses within which individual pursuits of script development are promoted, especially the ‘how-to’ market of screenwriting manuals, using the ‘practical realities’ of the screen industry as a basis for this critique. This article builds on this work to problematise script development as a solely collaborative pursuit. Those interviewed for the research occupy a breadth of script development roles across their respective countries and industries, including screenwriter, script consultant and script editor. While the how-to market often neglects the practical realities of script development by reducing it to the individual pursuit from idea to draft, it is not simply the case that the industrial perspective is always collaborative either, as these professionals reveal. This article investigates the relationship that exists between collaborative practices and the contributions of the individual.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Many production contexts require writers to use several skills to articulate and present their ideas before 'proper' collaboration begins, in the diverse forms of verbal pitching, writing of treatments, one-line summaries, and synopses as well as the very format-specific writing of scripts (Taylor and Batty, 2024: 164).”
From Is prompt engineering the future of screenwriting? Views of professional screenwriters and commissioners about the impact of AI technologies on their profession (2025) · cites this paper as Taylor and Batty, 2024
In the citing paper
“These gaps stem from its unique characteristics, including audiovisual storytelling [86], structured principles [65], and multi-stakeholder collaboration [9, 15, 99].”
From Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation (2025) · cites this paper as [99]
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, existing studies often focus on isolated stages of the creative process, overlooking the complete workflow that integrates structured principles [65] and collaboration with stakeholders [9, 15, 99], both of which are essential to screenwriting.”
From Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation (2025) · cites this paper as [99]
Citations
Cites
Screenwriting: Creative labor and professional practice
Conor, B. (2014) · doi:10.4324/9780203080771 · Cited by 70
Script development as a ‘wicked problem’
Batty, C., O’Meara, R., Taylor, S., Joyce, H., Burne, P., Maloney, N., Poole, M., & Tofler, M. (2018) · Journal of Screenwriting · doi:10.1386/josc.9.2.153_1 · Cited by 32
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Aristotle. 1905. Aristotle’s Politics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- 10.1007/978-3-030-21744-0_35 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-48713-3_16 · DOI
- 10.1386/josc.8.3.225_1 · DOI
- Bloore, P. 2013. The Screenplay Business: Managing Creativity and Script Development in the Film Industry. London and New York: Routledge.
- 10.1525/9780520932326 · DOI
- Campbell, J. 1949. The Hero with a Thousand Faces. New York: Pantheon.
- Conor, B. 2013. “Hired Hands, Liars, Schmucks: Histories of Screenwriting Work and Workers in Contemporary Screen Production.” In Theorizing Cultural Work: Transforming Labour in the Cultural and Creative Industries, edited by M. Banks, S. Taylor, and R. Gill, 44–55. London: Routledge.
- Girls. 2007–2012. cr. Lena Dunham. USA: HBO.
- 10.1386/josc_00012_1 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-48713-3_5 · DOI
- 10.1057/9781137338938_15 · DOI
- 10.1386/jmpr.5.2.89/0 · DOI
- 10.1057/9780230392298 · DOI
- Macdonald I. 2021. “Originality and Authorship in the Development of the Screen Idea.” In Script Development: Critical Approaches Creative Practices International Perspectives edited by C. Batty and S. Taylor 9–30. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan. · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-48713-3_12 · DOI
- 10.1386/josc.8.2.177_1 · DOI
- Maras S. 2009. Screenwriting: History Theory and Practice. London and New York: Wallflower Press.
- McKee, R. 1998. Story: Substance, Structure, Style. New York: Regan Books.
- 10.1007/978-3-030-48713-3_3 · DOI
- 10.1057/9781137338938_7 · DOI
- 10.1386/josc.8.3.319_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1386/josc.8.3.267_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_2 · DOI
- Snyder, B. 2005. Save the Cat!: The Last Book on Screenwriting That You’ll Ever Need. Studio City: Michael Wiese Productions
- 10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_11 · DOI
- 10.1080/17503175.2021.1922162 · DOI
- Thompson, K. 1999. Storytelling in the New Hollywood: Understanding Classical Narrative Technique. London: Harvard University Press.
- Tieber, C. 2012. “Stories, Conferences and Manuals: The Normative Function of Screenwriting Manuals in the Historical Context.” Theorizing Screenwriting Practice Workshop, Brno, Masaryk University, 22–25 November 2012, 1–6. [Conference Paper]
- 10.1007/978-3-030-82234-7_35 · DOI
- Vogler, C. 1992. The Writer’s Journey: Mythic Structure for Writers. 1st ed. Studio City: Michael Wiese Productions.
- 10.1007/978-3-319-95732-6 · DOI
Cited by
Understanding Screenwriters' Practices, Attitudes, and Future Expectations in Human-AI Co-Creation
Tang, Y., Li, H., Lan, M., Ma, X., & Qu, H. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3706598.3714120 · Cited by 18
“These gaps stem from its unique characteristics, including audiovisual story-telling [86], structured principles [65], and multi-stakeholder collaboration [9, 15, 99].”
Vainikka, E., Soronen, A., & Kallio, S.-M. (2025) · Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies · doi:10.1177/17496020241269277 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Taylor, S., & Batty, C.
- Affiliations
- RMIT University (AU)
- University of South Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Taylor, Stayci
- Venue
- Creative Industries Journal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2022-05-02
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-168
- ISSN
- 1751-0694 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-0708
- OpenAlex
- W4225276769
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- FWCI
- 5.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Creative Industries Journal (publishedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (acceptedVersion)
- UniSA Research Outputs Repository (University of South Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Artistic and Creative Research
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Cinema and Media Studies
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Cultural Industries and Urban Development
- Keywords
- script development, screenwriting, screen industry, collaboration, individual authorship, screenwriting manuals, screenwriters, screen production
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One for the team: understanding individual and collaborative pursuits of script development across competing discourses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17510694.2022.2065782
- The paper
- Taylor, S., & Batty, C. (2024). One for the team: understanding individual and collaborative pursuits of script development across competing discourses. Creative Industries Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2022.2065782