The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SOCIAL MEDIA AS BEAT: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections
Open accessAbstract
While the newspaper industry is in crisis and less time and resources are available for newsgathering, social media turn out to be a convenient and cheap beat for (political) journalism. This article investigates the use of Twitter as a source for newspaper coverage of the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Almost a quarter of the British and nearly half of the Dutch candidates shared their thoughts, visions, and experiences on Twitter. Subsequently, these tweets were increasingly quoted in newspaper coverage. We present a typology of the functions tweets have in news reports: they were either considered newsworthy as such, were a reason for further reporting, or were used to illustrate a broader news story. Consequently, we will show why politicians were successful in producing quotable tweets. While this paper, which is part of a broader project on how journalists (and politicians) use Twitter, focuses upon the coverage of election campaigns, our results indicate a broader trend in journalism. In the future, the reporter who attends events, gathers information face-to-face, and asks critical questions might instead aggregate information online and reproduce it in journalism discourse thereby altering the balance of power between journalists and sources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis
Fletcher, R., & Nielsen, R. K. (2018) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444817724170 · Cited by 738
Graham, T., Broersma, M., Hazelhoff, K., & van 't Haar, G. (2013) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.785581 · Cited by 363
Self-citationFlamino, J., Galeazzi, A., Feldman, S., Macy, M. W., Cross, B., Zhou, Z., Serafino, M., Bovet, A., Makse, H. A., & Szymanski, B. K. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01550-8 · Cited by 113
Journalists’ Use of Social Media to Infer Public Opinion: The Citizens’ Perspective
Dubois, E., Gruzd, A., & Jacobson, J. (2020) · Social Science Computer Review · doi:10.1177/0894439318791527 · Cited by 84
Supporting the Use of User Generated Content in Journalistic Practice
Tolmie, P., Procter, R., Randall, D. W., Rouncefield, M., Burger, C., Wong Sak Hoi, G., Zubiaga, A., & Liakata, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3025453.3025892 · Cited by 72
Metadata
- Authors
- Broersma, M., & Graham, T.
- Venue
- Journalism Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-06
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 403-419
- ISSN
- 1751-2786 (ISSN-L)
- 1751-2794
- OpenAlex
- W1542344929
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 60.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: SOCIAL MEDIA AS BEAT: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/17512786.2012.663626
- The paper
- Broersma, M., & Graham, T. (2012). SOCIAL MEDIA AS BEAT: Tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journalism Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.663626
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.