Cited by 113Misinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and PoliticsMedia Influence and Politics

Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections

Open access
Flamino, James, Galeazzi, Alessandro, Feldman, Stuart, Macy, Michael W., Cross, Brendan, Zhou, Zhenkun, Serafino, Matteo, Bovet, Alexandre +2 more·2023·Nature Human Behaviour

Abstract

Social media has been transforming political communication dynamics for over a decade. Here using nearly a billion tweets, we analyse the change in Twitter’s news media landscape between the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections. Using political bias and fact-checking tools, we measure the volume of politically biased content and the number of users propagating such information. We then identify influencers—users with the greatest ability to spread news in the Twitter network. We observe that the fraction of fake and extremely biased content declined between 2016 and 2020. However, results show increasing echo chamber behaviours and latent ideological polarization across the two elections at the user and influencer levels.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41562-023-01550-8

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Real and present concerns exist over the role of mis- and disinformation in public discourse, the emergence of echo chambers, and deepening political polarization, in particular around big societal issues like climate change.

    “Real and present concerns exist over the role of mis- and disinformation in public discourse (116–118), the emergence of echo chambers (119) and deepening political polarization (120, 121), in particular around big societal issues like climate change (122).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 54 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Brady, D. W. & Han, H. C. in Red and Blue Nation: Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics (eds Nivola, P. S. & Brady, D. W.) 1(3), 119–141 (Brookings Institute Press, Washington D.C., 2006).
  2. [37]Galston, W. A. & Nivola, P. S. Delineating the problem in Red and Blue Nation: Characteristics and Causes of America’s Polarized Politics (eds Nivola, P. S. & Brady, D. W.) 1(1):1–46 (Brookings Institute Press, Washington D.C., 2006).
  3. [50]Benzécri, J.-P. et al. L’analyse des données, Vol. 2 (Dunod, 1973).
  4. [54]Main, T. J. The Rise of the Alt-Right (Brookings Institution Press, 2018).
  5. [59]Bakshy, E., Hofman, J. M., Mason, W. A. & Watts, D. J. Identifying influencers on Twitter. In 4th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) (ed. King, I.), 2 (ACM, New York, NY, 2011).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Flamino, J., Galeazzi, A., Feldman, S., Macy, M. W., Cross, B., Zhou, Z., Serafino, M., Bovet, A., Makse, H. A., & Szymanski, B. K.
Affiliations
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
  • Ca' Foscari University of Venice (IT)
  • Cornell University (US)
  • Capital University of Economics and Business (CN)
  • City College of New York (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
  • Makse, Hernán A.
  • Szymanski, Boleslaw K.
Venue
Nature Human Behaviour
Published
2023-03-13
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
904-916
ISSN
2397-3374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4324130084
Cited by
113
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 48 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 1
FWCI
48.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Human Behaviour (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BSE-2214216, SES-2049207, BSE-2214217)
  • United States Department of Defense | Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR001121C0165)
  • Beijing Municipal Commission of Education (KM202210038002)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (R01 EB028157)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
political polarization, Twitter, news media, 2016 US presidential election, 2020 US presidential election, political bias, fact-checking, fake news, echo chambers, social media influencers, information dissemination, ideological polarization
MeSH terms
Communication, Humans, Mass Media, Politics, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review