Cited by 8Art Therapy and Mental HealthMental Health and Patient InvolvementParticipatory Visual Research Methods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Is designing therapeutic? A case study exploring the experience of co-design and psychosis.

Open access

Abstract

Background A co-design project, consisting of individual and collective design activities, was organized with clients of a mental health service, in order to explore its potential to support people with psychosis. The group met for approximately two hours, weekly, for six months, participating in design activities and collectively deciding on the project purpose and outcome – a boardgame.Methods The experience of one group participant (Anthony) is explored, selected as the first case study within an Interpretative Phenomenological Analytical (IPA) framework. Following IPA’s ideographic focus, Anthony’s case was purposefully selected, as it portrayed a detailed picture, informing theoretical reflection on designing as therapeutic. The paper includes Anthony’s first-hand account, combined with an analysis of data from three semi-structured interviews, photographic evidence and a reflective diary kept by the lead researcher.Results Results suggest that, for Anthony, design activity: a) helps developing a sense of agency b) is experienced as grounding in reality c) contributes to the development of inter-personal relationships, and d) has a different sense of rhythm than artistic practice.Discussion These results are contextualized within literature on the lived experience of psychosis and suggest that designing can be beneficial for people with psychosis, providing the backdrop for further research and practice.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17522439.2022.2052450

Cites

28 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Aeferences blank for review
  2. Flowers P, 2008, JournalQualitative Methods in Psychology Bulletin, 5, 24
  3. Fuchs T., 2017, Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 24, 2
  4. Glazzard M., 2015, Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Design4Health, 13
  5. Mužina, T. (2020). Co-design of an app used to monitor symptoms of depression in young adults. In K. Christer, C. Craig & P. Chamberlai (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Design4HealthAmsterdam, Netherlands, 1st-3rd July 2020 (pp. 441–451). https://research.shu.ac.uk/design4health/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/D4H-Proceedings-2020-Vol-3-Final.pdf
  6. Tsekleves E, 2020, Design for wellbeing: An Applied Approach

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Illarregi, E. R., Alexiou, K., DiMalta, G., & Zamenopoulos, T.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
Corresponding author
Illarregi, Erika Renedo
Venue
Psychosis
Published
2022-04-27
Volume
15
Issue
3
Pages
277-291
ISSN
  • 1752-2439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-2447
OpenAlex
W4224989451
Cited by
8
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5
FWCI
14.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychosis (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/L503770/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Art Therapy and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
co-design, lived experience of psychosis, board games, sense of agency, interpersonal relationships, mental health service users

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review