Cited by 202Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesSleep and Wakefulness ResearchFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cortical reactivity and effective connectivity during REM sleep in humans

Open access

Abstract

We recorded the electroencephalographic (EEG) responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) during the first rapid eye movement (REM) sleep episode of the night and we compared them with the responses obtained during previous wakefulness and NREM sleep. Confirming previous findings, upon falling into NREM sleep, cortical activations became more local and stereotypical, indicating a significant impairment of the intracortical dialogue. During REM sleep, a state in which subjects regain consciousness but are almost paralyzed, TMS triggered more widespread and differentiated patterns of cortical activation, that were similar to the ones observed in wakefulness. Similarly, TMS/hd-EEG may be used to probe the internal dialogue of the thalamocortical system in brain injured patients that are unable to move and communicate.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17588921003731578

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 10.1073/pnas.041430398 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–201 of 201

Metadata

Authors
Massimini, M., Ferrarelli, F., Murphy, M. J., Huber, R., Riedner, B. A., Casarotto, S., & Tononi, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Tononi, G.
Venue
Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
2010-08-18
Volume
1
Issue
3
Pages
176-183
ISSN
  • 1758-8928 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-8936
OpenAlex
W2007400818
Cited by
202
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 13
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (DP1OD000579)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
REM sleep, NREM sleep, cortical reactivity, effective connectivity, transcranial magnetic stimulation, EEG, thalamocortical system, brain injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review