Cited by 160Algal biology and biofuel productionBioenergy crop production and managementAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 123 of the 123 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An overview of the potential environmental impacts of large-scale microalgae cultivation.

Open access
Usher, Philippa K., Ross, Andrew B., Camargo-Valero, Miller Alonso, Tomlin, Alison S., Gale, William F.·2014·Biofuels

Abstract

Cultivation of microalgae for applications such as fuel, food, pharmaceuticals and farming is a rapidly developing area of research and investment. Whilst microalgae promises to deliver many environmental benefits compared with existing biofuel technology, there are also issues to overcome in relation to wastewater management, emissions control, land use change and responsible development of genetically modified organisms. This review seeks to highlight both the positive and negative impacts of microalgae cultivation, focusing on impacts to the aquatic, atmospheric and terrestrial biospheres that may occur and would need to be managed should the microalgae cultivation industry continue to grow.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17597269.2014.913925

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 121 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Dragone G., 2010, Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology, 1355
  2. Batan L, 2013, Algal Res.
  3. Woo S-G, 2012, Talanta, 1
  4. Department for Transport, 2013, The Renewable Transport Fuel Obligations (Amendment). Sustainable and Renewable Fuels
  5. US EPA, 2011, Fuels Fuel Addit
  6. IEA, Energy Technology Perspectives: Scenarios and Stratergies to 2050
  7. Thurmond W, 2011, Algae 2020 Volume 2. Emerging Markets Online, 1
  8. Borowitzka MA, 1990, Resour. Pap., 180
  9. Thomas G, 2000, US DOE Hydrogen Programme 2000 Annual Review.
  10. Pradhan A, 2011, Am. Soc. Agric. Biol. Eng., 54, 1031
  11. UN-Water, World Water Development Report (WWDR4): Managing Water under Uncertainty and Risk
  12. Wells SG, Algal-Based Fuels
  13. Crouzet P, 1999, Nutrients in European Ecosystems, 145
  14. **Science Communication Unit, Sustainable Phosphorus Use
  15. Kathy E, 2004, Antibiotics Field Data - Scientific Investigations Report 2004–5138
  16. Martín J, 2012, J. Hazard. Mater., 239
  17. Food Standards Agency, 2003, Expert Group on Vitamins and Minerals. Risk assessment: Phosphorus
  18. WHO Guidelines, 1998, Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality: Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information
  19. Curtis TP, 1992, Water Sci. Technol., 26, 1729−1738
  20. *Harmelen T, Microalgae Biofixation Processes: Applications and Potential Contributions to Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options
  21. Carlsson AS, Micro- and macro-algae: utility for industrial applications
  22. ARUP, Havant Thicket Winter Storage Reservoir Environmental Impact Assessment Scoping Report
  23. 10.1021/es302396j · DOI
  24. Young AM, 2011, Theses Diss., 986
  25. Poulet G, 2003, Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2002 Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project
  26. Law KS, 2006, Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2006 Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project
  27. O’Dowd CD, 2002, Nature, 417
  28. Matos CT, 2013, Green Chem.
  29. Morais MG, 2011, J. Biosci., 66, 313
  30. 10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00211-X · DOI
  31. 10.1021/es900705j · DOI · Paper page
  32. Li P, 2011, J. Biomed. Biotechnol.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Usher, P. K., Ross, A. B., Camargo-Valero, M. A., Tomlin, A. S., & Gale, W. F.
Affiliations
University of Leeds (GB)
Corresponding author
Ross, Andrew B.
Venue
Biofuels
Published
2014-05-04
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
331-349
ISSN
  • 1759-7269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1759-7277
OpenAlex
W2132575284
Cited by
160
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biofuels (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Leeds
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/I014365/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
microalgae cultivation, environmental impact, wastewater management, emission control, land use change, genetically modified organisms, aquaculture, atmospheric effects, terrestrial biosphere

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review