Cited by 33Science Education and PedagogyIndigenous and Place-Based EducationEducational Theory and Curriculum Studies

Teachers’ Knowledge and Views on the Use of Learners’ Socio-cultural Background in Teaching Natural Sciences in Grade 9 Township Classes

Mavuru, Lydia, Ramnarain, Umesh·2017·African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education

Abstract

This article explores teachers’ knowledge and views on the role of learners’ socio-cultural background when teaching Natural Sciences to Grade 9 learners at three South African township schools. Within a socio-cultural framework, the research investigated how teachers accommodate learners’ cultural norms and values, religion and beliefs, socio-economic and political issues in their science lessons. In a qualitative case study, three teachers were interviewed five times using a semi-structured interview schedule. Through a constant comparative data analysis method, three themes emerged. Firstly, teachers were aware of the learners’ poor socio-economic background, and they made accommodation in their practice so that these learners would not be disadvantaged. Secondly, it emerged that teachers use their knowledge about learners’ socio-cultural practices and beliefs, to create learning opportunities to harmonise the conflict between learners’ worldviews and science. Lastly, the findings showed that teachers’ incorporation of learners’ socio-cultural background in lessons provides authentic learning situations that promoted the development of critical and analytical thinking skills in learners. This study affirms the call for teacher education institutions to review their science teacher education programmes with a view to incorporating and emphasising knowledge of learners’ socio-cultural background as an important teacher knowledge domain in teacher preparation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/18117295.2017.1327239

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mavuru, L., & Ramnarain, U.
Affiliations
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Corresponding author
Mavuru, Lydia
Venue
African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education
Published
2017-05-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
176-186
ISSN
  • 1028-8457 (ISSN-L)
  • 1811-7295
  • 2469-7656
OpenAlex
W2619455040
Cited by
30
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
12.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
African Journal of Research in Mathematics Science and Technology Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Keywords
sociocultural background, science education, ninth grade students, township schools, teacher knowledge, teacher beliefs, socioeconomic deprivation, worldview conflict, critical thinking, science teacher education, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review