Cited by 33Science Education and PedagogyEducational Theory and Curriculum StudiesScience and Education Research

Learners’ socio-cultural backgrounds and science teaching and learning: a case study of township schools in South Africa

Mavuru, Lydia, Ramnarain, Umesh·2020·Cultural Studies of Science Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11422-020-09974-8

Cites

113 of 113 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

7 of the 120 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mavuru, L., & Ramnarain, U.
Affiliations
University of Johannesburg (ZA)
Corresponding author
Mavuru, Lydia
Venue
Cultural Studies of Science Education
Published
2020-06-18
Volume
15
Issue
4
Pages
1067-1095
ISSN
  • 1871-1502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1871-1510
OpenAlex
W3036895448
Cited by
33
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cultural Studies of Science Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science and Education Research
Keywords
science teaching and learning, township schools, local curriculum, culturally responsive teaching, authentic problem solving, socioeconomic diversity, equity in science education, critical thinking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review