Cited by 14Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchPsychiatric care and mental health servicesInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

What Can the Experiences of People With an Intellectual Disability Tell Us About the Desirable Attributes of a Mental Health Professional?

Open access
Weise, Janelle, Fisher, Karen R, Whittle, Erin, Trollor, Julian N·2018·Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract

Introduction: Mental health professionals have reported that they have limited knowledge, skills, and confidence in the area of intellectual disability mental health. This article aims to learn from the experiences of people with intellectual disability about the attributes that may assist mainstream mental health professionals to provide them with a quality mental health service. Methods: Six people with intellectual disability participated in an interview or focus group. Thematic analysis was undertaken applying the Intellectual Disability Mental Health Core Competencies Framework. Results: The findings supported previous research for the need for mental health professionals to be adaptable, able to communicate, and work with a person’s support network. The study reinforced the need for professionals to undertake professional development in the area but also suggested that people with intellectual disability be included as educators and as peer workers. New attributes were identified, including the need for mental health professionals to be able to build rapport and trust through demonstrating their experience and respect for working with people with intellectual disability, and their ability to understand trauma and how it may influence mental health needs. Conclusions: The attributes identified in the study could be used to inform an intellectual disability mental health workforce development framework.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19315864.2018.1469700

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 42 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320(7226), 50-52.
  2. O'Brien, A., & Rose, J. (2010). Improving mental health services for people with intellectual disabilities: service users' views. Advances in Mental Health and Intellectual Disabilities, 4(4), 40-47.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weise, J., Fisher, K. R., Whittle, E., & Trollor, J. N.
Affiliations
UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Trollor, Julian N
Venue
Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Published
2018-05-17
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
183-202
ISSN
  • 1931-5864 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-5872
OpenAlex
W2803969590
Cited by
14
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health Research in Intellectual Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • UNSWorks (University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
National Health and Medical Research Council (APP1056128)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
intellectual disability, mental health professionals, professional qualities, service user perspectives, professional development, peer support workers, trauma, social support networks, workforce development, communication skills, adaptability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review