Cited by 62Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchPsychiatric care and mental health servicesFamily and Disability Support Research

Mainstream In‐Patient Mental Health Care for People with Intellectual Disabilities: Service User, Carer and Provider Experiences

Donner, Ben, Mutter, Robin, Scior, Katrina·2010·Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities

Abstract

Background Government guidelines promote the use of mainstream mental health services for people with intellectual disabilities whenever possible. However, little is known about the experiences of people with intellectual disabilities who use such services. Materials and Methods Face‐to‐face interviews with service users, carers and community nurses were completed and analysed on a case by case basis using interpretative phenomenological analysis. The results were followed up in focus groups with service providers. Results Positive aspects included the provision of respite, particularly for carers, and good basic care. These were outweighed by a perception of the admission as disempowering and lacking in flexible treatment provision. Accessing help emerged as a major problem, as well as the prospect of staff neglecting the specific needs of people with intellectual disabilities. Conclusions While there were some indications of improvements in line with recent policies and guidance, mainstream services seem a long way off realizing aims of easy accessibility, person‐centred practices and active partnership with intellectual disability services.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-3148.2009.00527.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Donner, B., Mutter, R., & Scior, K.
Affiliations
  • North East London NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of East London (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Venue
Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-15
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
214-225
ISSN
  • 0952-9608 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-2322
  • 1468-3148
OpenAlex
W2054206555
Cited by
62
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
intellectual disability, psychiatric inpatient care, service user experiences, caregiver experiences, community nurses, respite care, access to mental health care, person-centred care, deinstitutionalization, intellectual disability services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review