Cited by 68Sexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyGender, Feminism, and MediaAdolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health

Sexting Behaviors Among College Students: Cause for Concern?

Perkins, Andrew B., Becker, Judith V., Tehee, Melissa, Mackelprang, Emily·2014·International Journal of Sexual Health

Abstract

. Objectives: Sexting, defined as the transmission of sexually suggestive or explicit pictures or videos via mobile phone, has garnered considerable attention in both the public and research sectors. In popular culture, sexting has received considerable negative attention in regards to potential risk. Methods: The present study examined the prevalence of sexting behaviors among 287 volunteer students attending a university in the Southwest United States, as well as the extent to which concerns about sexting appear to be founded or unfounded. Results: Responses indicated that 38% of the participants had sent and/or received sexts during the past 6 months. Of those who engaged in sexting in the past 6 months, 84% had sent 1 to 10 sexts and 88% had received 1 to 10 sexts. Most respondents (64%) indicated that they had sent nude or seminude sexts for consensual sexual reasons. Of those individuals, 87% who reported sending sexts and 71% who reported receiving sexts indicated that the sexting occurred during a romantic relationship. Those who engaged in nude sexting had an earlier age of initiation into sexual behavior and had more sexual partners. Participants who had sent and received nude sexts also had some evidence of risky behavior including drug use and behavior problems in childhood. Additionally, participants who did not engage in sexting scored lower on measures of hostility toward women. Conclusions: Despite these findings, the overall study suggests that sexting may not be a cause for concern. Possible positive aspects of sexting and recommendations for future research are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19317611.2013.841792

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Perkins, A. B., Becker, J. V., Tehee, M., & Mackelprang, E.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Perkins, Andrew B.
Venue
International Journal of Sexual Health
Published
2014-04-03
Volume
26
Issue
2
Pages
79-92
ISSN
  • 1931-7611 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-762X
OpenAlex
W2078942881
Cited by
67
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Sexual Health (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
Keywords
sexting, university students, prevalence, romantic relationships, sexual initiation, sexual partners, sexual risk behavior, drug use, child behavior problems, hostility toward women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review