The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Customer Engagement: A Framework for Assessing Customer-Brand Relationships: The Case of the Restaurant Industry
Abstract
Customer-brand relationships do not just exist, they develop over time and through multiple service experiences, yet the literature typically discusses customer-brand relationships as being a largely static phenomenon. Very limited attention has been given over to the service evaluation processes of customers who are new to a service brand, as compared to customers who are experienced with the service brand. Research additionally continues to rely on the historically dominant customer satisfaction paradigm as the most effective method with which to evaluate service experiences at the expense of other relational mediators such as involvement, calculative commitment, affective commitment, and trust. This limits the extent to which a more complete and dynamic understanding of the nature of customer-brand relationships and the processes by which engagement with the brand and ultimately loyalty to the brand may be fostered for customers in different consumption stages. A phenomenological investigation into the process of customer engagement, as revealed through customers' restaurant dining experiences, is presented to examine these issues. The data for this study was provided by five focus groups and nine in-depth interviews. The results of the study indicate that the role of relational mediators differs across new and repeat purchase segments of customers. These findings have important implications for the management of customer-brand relationships amongst different customer segments and for the development of operational strategies to improve service provision within the restaurant industry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationships
Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1251829 · Cited by 6,822
The Different Roles of Satisfaction, Trust, and Commitment in Customer Relationships
Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224299906300205 · Cited by 4,899
Oliver, R. L. (1999) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/00222429990634s105 · Cited by 4,898
Product/Consumption-Based Affective Responses and Postpurchase Processes
Westbrook, R. A. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378702400302 · Cited by 2,462 · cited 1×
“, 2001) global evaluation (Westbrook, 1987), and a cognitive response, affective response and conative response (Giese & Cote, 2002).”
BackgroundHennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., & Gremler, D. D. (2002) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670502004003006 · Cited by 2,301
Mittal, V., & Kamakura, W. A. (2001) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1509/jmkr.38.1.131.18832 · Cited by 2,256
Harrison-Walker, L. J. (2001) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/109467050141006 · Cited by 1,583 · cited 1×
“Research investigating the moderating role of affective commitment on loyalty, has found that affective commitment may lead to a greater desire to remain with that brand, a willingness to invest in the brand and a propensity to engage in positive WOM communication (Wetzels et al., 1998; Harrison-Walker, 2001).”
Background
Cited by
Consumer engagement in a virtual brand community: An exploratory analysis
Brodie, R. J., Ilic, A., Juric, B., & Hollebeek, L. (2013) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.07.029 · Cited by 3,221
Hudson, S., Huang, L., Roth, M. S., & Madden, T. J. (2016) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.06.004 · Cited by 676
Customer engagement in social media: a framework and meta-analysis
de Oliveira Santini, F., Ladeira, W. J., Pinto, D. C., Herter, M. M., Sampaio, C. H., & Babin, B. J. (2020) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-020-00731-5 · Cited by 523
Customer engagement and online reviews
Thakur, R. (2018) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.11.002 · Cited by 336
Does gamification engage users in online shopping?
García-Jurado, A., Torres-Jiménez, M., Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., & Castro-González, P. (2021) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101076 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowden, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2009-07-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 574-596
- ISSN
- 1936-8623 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-8631
- OpenAlex
- W2072567687
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 7.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Customer Engagement: A Framework for Assessing Customer-Brand Relationships: The Case of the Restaurant Industry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/19368620903024983
- The paper
- Bowden, J. (2009). Customer Engagement: A Framework for Assessing Customer-Brand Relationships: The Case of the Restaurant Industry. Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368620903024983
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.