Satisfaction, Repurchase Intent, and Repurchase Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Customer Characteristics
Open accessAbstract
Despite the claim that satisfaction ratings are linked to repurchase behavior, few attempts can be found that relate satisfaction ratings to actual repurchase behavior. This article fills this void by presenting a conceptual model for relating satisfaction ratings and repurchase behavior. The model is based on the premise that ratings observed in a typical customer satisfaction survey are error-prone measures of the customer's true satisfaction, and they may vary systematically on the basis of consumer characteristics. The authors apply the model to a large-scale study of 100,040 automotive customers. Results show that consumers with different characteristics have different thresholds such that, at the same level of rated satisfaction, repurchase rates are systematically different among different customer groups. The authors also find that the nature and extent of response bias in satisfaction ratings varies by customer characteristics. In one group, the response bias is so high that rated satisfaction is completely uncorrelated to repurchase behavior (r = 0). Furthermore, the authors find that, though nonlinear, the functional form relating rated satisfaction to repurchase intent is different from the one relating it to repurchase behavior. Although the functional form exhibits decreasing returns in the case of repurchase intent, it exhibits monotonically increasing returns in the case of repurchase behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Customer satisfaction influences the factors that signify customer loyalty or the long-term orientation of a relationship.
“Over the years, several researchers such as Ganesan (1994), Mittal, Ross, and Baldasare (1998), Mittal and Kamakura (2001) and others have exhibited customer satisfaction to be influenc -ing the factors that signify customer loyalty or in other words, the long-term orientation of a relationship.”
From The Antecedents of Customer Loyalty: An Empirical Investigation in Life Insurance Context (2013) · cites this paper as Mittal and Kamakura (2001)
Cites
Bolton, R. N. (1998) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.17.1.45 · Cited by 1,948 · see citing works
Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations.
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.105.1.131 · Cited by 1,550 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research directions
van Doorn, J., Lemon, K. N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P. C. (2010) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510375599 · Cited by 3,536 · see citing works
Self-citationE-satisfaction and e-loyalty: A contingency framework
Anderson, R. E., & Srinivasan, S. S. (2003) · Psychology & Marketing · doi:10.1002/mar.10063 · Cited by 2,310 · see citing works
Consumer Switching Costs: A Typology, Antecedents, and Consequences
Burnham, T. A., Frels, J. K., & Mahajan, V. (2003) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070302250897 · Cited by 1,858 · see citing works
Lam, S. Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M. K., & Murthy, B. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304263330 · Cited by 1,828 · see citing works
Gustafsson, A., Johnson, M. D., & Roos, I. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.210 · Cited by 1,576 · see citing works
Bart, Y., Shankar, V., Sultan, F., & Urban, G. L. (2005) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.133 · Cited by 1,482 · see citing works
The Process of Customer Engagement: A Conceptual Framework
Bowden, J. L.-H. (2009) · Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice · doi:10.2753/mtp1069-6679170105 · Cited by 1,365 · see citing works
Online customer experience in e-retailing: An empirical model of antecedents and outcomes
Rose, S., Clark, M., Samouel, P., & Hair, N. (2012) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2012.03.001 · Cited by 1,131 · see citing works
The Evolution of Loyalty Intentions
Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (2006) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.70.2.122 · Cited by 787 · see citing works
Bolton, R. N., Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2004) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070304263341 · Cited by 741 · see citing works
Ranaweera, C., & Prabhu, J. (2003) · International Journal of Service Industry Management · doi:10.1108/09564230310489231 · Cited by 700 · see citing works
A cross-cultural study of switching barriers and propensity to stay with service providers
Patterson, P. G., & Smith, T. (2003) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(03)00009-5 · Cited by 515 · see citing works
N. Bolton, R., Gustafsson, A., McColl-Kennedy, J., J. Sirianni, N., & K. Tse, D. (2014) · Journal of Service Management · doi:10.1108/josm-01-2014-0034 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Re-examining online customer experience to include purchase frequency and perceived risk
Martin, J., Mortimer, G., & Andrews, L. (2015) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.03.008 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Customer satisfaction and loyalty in service: Two concepts, four constructs, several relationships
Bodet, G. (2008) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2007.11.004 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Social effects on customer retention
Nitzan, I., & Libai, B. (2011) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jm.10.0209 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
The impact of satisfaction and payment equity on cross-buying
Verhoef, P. C., Franses, P. H., & Hoekstra, J. C. (2001) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/s0022-4359(01)00052-5 · Cited by 276 · see citing works
A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood
Ryu, G., & Feick, L. (2007) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.1.084 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Choice Models and Customer Relationship Management
Kamakura, W., Mela, C. F., Ansari, A., Bodapati, A., Fader, P., Iyengar, R., Naik, P., Neslin, S., Sun, B., Verhoef, P. C., et al. (2005) · Marketing Letters · doi:10.1007/s11002-005-5892-2 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Antecedents of Customer Loyalty: An Empirical Investigation in Life Insurance Context
Banaras Hindu University, F. O. M. S., Alok, K. R., & Srivastava, M. (2013) · Journal of Competitiveness · doi:10.7441/joc.2013.02.10 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
“Over the years, several researchers such as Ganesan (1994), Mittal, Ross, and Baldasare (1998), Mittal and Kamakura (2001) and others have exhibited customer satisfaction to be influencing the factors that signify customer loyalty or in other words, the long-term orientation of a relationship.”
BackgroundKim, B. (2012) · Telecommunications Policy · doi:10.1016/j.telpol.2011.11.011 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Liu, W., Jiang, M., Li, W., & Mou, J. (2024) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123407 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
The moderating role of switching barriers on customer loyalty in the life insurance industry
Chen, M.-F., & Wang, L.-H. (2009) · The Service Industries Journal · doi:10.1080/02642060902764574 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Comegys, C., Hannula, M., & Väisänen, J. (2006) · Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing · doi:10.1057/palgrave.jt.5740193 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Guo, B., & Wang, D. (2024) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/00222437231153075 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Salazar, M. T., Harrison, T., & Ansell, J. (2007) · Journal of Financial Services Marketing · doi:10.1057/palgrave.fsm.4760066 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Blut, M., Frennea, C. M., Mittal, V., & Mothersbaugh, D. L. (2015) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2015.01.001 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationTudoran, A. A., & Olsen, S. O. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1633 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“One or all of these facets are commonly used to measure repurchase intention in marketing and consumer behavior literature (e.g. Mittal and Kamakura, 2001; Seiders et al., 2005; Soderlund and Ohman, 2005).”
BackgroundReimer, K., & Becker, J. U. (2015) · Management Review Quarterly · doi:10.1007/s11301-014-0110-z · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Carter, L., Gray, D., D'Alessandro, S., & Johnson, L. (2016) · Services Marketing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/15332969.2016.1217680 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mittal, V., & Kamakura, W. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- University of Iowa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Mittal, Vikas
- Kamakura, Wagner A.
- ORCID
- Kamakura, Wagner A.
- Venue
- Journal of Marketing Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 131-142
- ISSN
- 0022-2437 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-7193
- OpenAlex
- W2046491831
- Cited by
- 2,256
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 91 · 2020: 120 · 2019: 107 · 2018: 124 · 2017: 115 · 2016: 135 · 2015: 136 · 2014: 150 · 2013: 125 · 2012: 136
- FWCI
- 70.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- Journal of Marketing Research (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
- Keywords
- customer satisfaction, repurchase behavior, client characteristics, response bias, moderating effect
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review