The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Tangible and Intangible Restaurant Attributes on Overall Experience: A Consumer Oriented Approach
Abstract
This study investigates the attributes that foreign visitors attach importance when choosing a restaurant and their perceptions of the performance of restaurants in the Cappadocia Region in Turkey through a consumer-oriented approach. In this quantitative study, data were collected via surveys which were formed based on review of the literature, a brainstorming, experts’ views and a pilot test. It has been determined that the attributes related to cleanliness are attached the utmost importance by the participants and the attributes related to employees are also considered to be highly important while having dining experience. Another important finding is that most of the attributes were perceived to be performed satisfactorily while some of the attributes related to menu and supporting services were considered to be underperformed. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed based on the findings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“tangible cues have been shown to shape customers' overall experience of a restaurant even when they do not directly affect the taste or nutritional content of what is served (Karamustafa & Ülker, 2020).”
From Restaurant Service Quality in Relation to Customer Satisfaction (2026) · cites this paper as Karamustafa & Ülker, 2020
In the citing paper
“Read together, these findings suggest that in this market, interpersonal and procedural service delivery carries more weight in shaping customer perception than the physical environment”
From Restaurant Service Quality in Relation to Customer Satisfaction (2026) · cites this paper as Karamustafa and Ülker (2020)
Citations
Cites
Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory Factor Analysis Results: A Review
Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.3200/joer.99.6.323-338 · Cited by 6,937
Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W. R. (2005) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.007 · Cited by 906 · cited 3×
“RMSEA value is also stated to be affected by sample size but provide better and reasonable results (Sharma et al., 2005).”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- 10.1007/978-1-349-11687-4_21 · DOI
- Albayrak T., 2011, Ege Akademik Bakis, 11, 627
- 10.1177/0193841X8901300103 · DOI
- 10.1108/08876040610646536 · DOI
- 10.1080/02642069200000042 · DOI
- 10.1108/09604521011011630 · DOI
- 10.1080/15256480801910178 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.02.009 · DOI
- 10.1080/15378020.2010.500254 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0261-5177(99)00070-9 · DOI
- 10.1108/09596119810222104 · DOI
- Cohen E., 1972, Social Research, 39, 164
- 10.1111/fri.2008.19.issue-3 · DOI
- 10.1300/J369v07n02_05 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tourman.2006.07.010 · DOI
- 10.1177/073428290502300303 · DOI
- 10.1080/19368623.2012.671562 · DOI
- 10.1108/03090569310026402 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tourman.2004.06.008 · DOI
- Giddens A., 1991, Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age
- 10.1300/J073v04n02_03 · DOI
- Hair J. F., 2014, Multivariate data analysis: Pearson new international edition
- 10.1080/15378020.2011.594388 · DOI
- 10.1080/02508281.2004.11081459 · DOI
- 10.1080/10941660208722106 · DOI
- Hooper D., 2008, The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53
- 10.1080/19368623.2016.1181020 · DOI
- 10.1300/J061v02n04_05 · DOI
- 10.1080/15378020.2012.677392 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02291817 · DOI
- 10.1108/09596119510146823 · DOI
- Karamustafa K., 2015, Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 39, 108
- Karamustafa K., 2015, Tüketici Ve Tüketim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7, 117
- Karamustafa K., 2016, Çatalhöyük - International Journal of Tourism and Social Research, 1, 221
- Karamustafa K., 2018, Proceedings of the second international congress on future of tourism: Innovation, entrepreneurship and sustainability (Futourism 2018), 810
- 10.1108/09590559410067325 · DOI
- 10.1080/15256481003732816 · DOI
- 10.1108/09596119710164650 · DOI
- 10.1177/1096348006286797 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/09596110010304984 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.238 · DOI
- 10.1177/002224297704100112 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0019-8501(03)00055-5 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0278-4319(00)00037-2 · DOI
- 10.1080/136067197376248 · DOI
- Olson R. P., 1994, Travel, tourism, and hospitality research: A handbook for managers and researchers, 305
- Özdemir B., 2018, Yiyecek içecek yönetimi [Food and beverage management](pp, 47
- 10.1016/j.ijhm.2003.08.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/0160-7383(78)90115-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0261-5177(03)00130-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13032917.1998.9686958 · DOI
- Rohrmann, B. (2003). Soundscapes in restaurants. World Forum Acoustic Ecology: Proceedings of the International Symposium of Acoustic Ecology, Melbourne. Retreived from http://www.rohrmannresearch.net/pdfs/spp-brsir.pdf
- 10.1177/1096348006295506 · DOI
- Sekaran U., 2016, Research methods for business: A skill building approach
- 10.1177/004728758802700202 · DOI
- 10.1108/02656710210438122 · DOI
- 10.1108/09596110310458936 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4135/9781412984904 · DOI
- 10.1177/0010880404265345 · DOI
- 10.1108/01443570710742375 · DOI
- 10.1080/19368623.2012.624295 · DOI
- 10.1080/14724040308668144 · DOI
- 10.1300/J369v07n01_03 · DOI
- 10.1080/19368623.2010.514554 · DOI
- 10.1108/09526860110391568 · DOI
- Yüksel, A. (2000). Foodservice experience and tourist satisfaction and their implications for destination (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
- 10.1177/109634802237482 · DOI
- 10.1177/135676670200900104 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Restaurant Service Quality in Relation to Customer Satisfaction
Cabanday, F., & Estrosas, J. L. (2026) · The International Review of Multidisciplinary Research · doi:10.67167/vertex.656
“Tangibility's comparatively lower standing, despite still being rated Very Good, echoes Karamustafa and Ülker (2020), who similarly found that customers weighted food quality, staff hospitality, and service speed more heavily than physical décor.”
Influential
Metadata
- Authors
- Karamustafa, K., & Ülker, P.
- Affiliations
- Faculty of Tourism, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey
- Erciyes University (TR)
- Venue
- Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-10-15
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 404-427
- ISSN
- 1936-8623 (ISSN-L)
- 1936-8631
- OpenAlex
- W2981078486
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Culinary Culture and Tourism
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
- Keywords
- restaurant attributes, tangibles, intangible attributes, foreign tourists, restaurant choice, cleanliness, employee service, dining experience, menu quality, supporting services, Cappadocia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review