Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,604

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Research methods in education

Ingleby, Ewan·2012·Professional Development in Education

Abstract

7th ed., edited by L. Cohen, L. Manion, and K. Morrison, London, Routledge, 2011, xii + 758 pp., £22.89 (paperback), ISBN 978-0-41-558336-7 This seventh edition of Research Methods in Education pro...

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19415257.2011.643130

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Burrell G., 1979, Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis
  2. Popper K., 1983, Realism and the aim of science
  3. 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2006.00508.x · DOI
  4. Zahar E., 1989, Einstein’s revolution: a study in heuristic

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Ingleby, E.
Venue
Professional Development in Education
Published
2012-07
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
507-509
ISSN
  • 1941-5257 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-5265
OpenAlex
W1984520723
Cited by
1,604
References
0
Type
book review
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.