The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Controlling the Narrative: A Comparative Examination of Gendered Publishing Trends in the SCA and Beyond
Abstract
This article explores the relationship between gender and authorship in conference presentations and publications as a lens to examine current disciplinary sociopolitics and the relative contributions of men and women in California archaeology. I contextualize this analysis within a broader comparison to other regions, including Southeastern archaeology as well as the North American archaeology community at large. I also examine how occupational affiliation in different sectors of archaeology (including academic, agency, museums, private sector/CRM, and others) bears on publishing trends. An evaluation of publishing trends serves as a means to investigate academic merit and visibility, along with the production and validation of knowledge in California archaeology and beyond. Despite growing parity in the numbers of women represented in professional organizations and presenting research at regional and national conferences, disparities remain with respect to publication in peer-reviewed journals, including in Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, California Archaeology, Southeastern Archaeology, and American Antiquity. I explore possible reasons for these disparities, including links to occupational affiliation, and conclude with some recommendations for change.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Women are disadvantaged compared to men in archaeology, including lower rates of lead-authorship, publication in top-tier journals, citation, grant submission, hiring at PhD granting institutions, and holding CRM permits.
“Many indicators suggest that women are disadvantaged compared to men in the discipline, including their lower rates of lead-authorship, publication in top-tier journals, citation, grant submission, hiring at PhD granting institutions, and holding CRM permits (e.g., Bardolph 2018;Fulkerson and Tushingham 2019;Goldstein et al. 2018;Hutson 2002;Jalbert 2019;Speakman et al. 2018;Tushingham et al. 2017”
From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Bardolph 2018
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1080/1947461X.2016.1249593 · DOI
- 10.7183/0002-7316.79.3.522 · DOI
- 10.1080/0734578X.2015.1113101 · DOI
- Baxter Jane E., 2005, The SAA Archaeological Record, 5, 7
- Beaudry Mary C., 1994, Women in Archaeology, 138
- 10.1177/000271629956100107 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0189136 · DOI
- 10.1002/bies.20272 · DOI
- Brown Kaitlin, 2018, California Archaeology, 10
- Burkholder Jo Ellen, 2006, The SAA Archaeological Record, 6, 27
- 10.1177/1529100614541236 · DOI
- Claassen Cheryl, 1992, Exploring Gender Through Archaeology
- Claassen Cheryl, 1994, Women in Archaeology
- Claassen Cheryl, 1999, Journal Southeastern Archaeology. Southeastern Archaeology, 18, 85
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0102172 · DOI · Paper page
- Clarke Anne, 1993, Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, 191
- 10.1126/sciadv.1400005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11759-005-0003-9 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10816-007-9039-z · DOI
- Cusack Carole M., 1993, Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, 232
- 10.1080/1947461X.2016.1250462 · DOI
- du Cros Hilary, 1993, Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique
- 10.1353/rhe.1996.0027 · DOI
- 10.2307/280492 · DOI
- 10.1525/ap3a.1994.5.1.157 · DOI
- 10.1017/aaq.2017.73 · DOI
- Hutson Scott R., 1998, SAA Bulletin, 16, 19
- 10.2307/2694570 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0049682 · DOI
- 10.1038/504211a · DOI
- 10.1179/sea.2014.33.2.008 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0020818313000209 · DOI
- McElhinney Bonnie, 2003, Language in Society, 32, 299, 10.1017/S0047404503323012 · DOI
- 10.1017/aap.2018.23 · DOI
- Misra Joya, 2011, Academe, 97, 22
- 10.1017/S104909651000017X · DOI
- 10.1007/s10816-007-9033-5 · DOI
- Nelson Margaret C., 1994, Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology
- 10.1111/aman.12929 · DOI
- 10.1177/0003122414564008 · DOI
- Rautman Alison E., 2012, The SAA Archaeological Record, 12, 25
- Reddy Seetha, 2017, Society for California Archaeology Newsletter, 51, 19
- 10.1023/A:1015575616285 · DOI
- 10.1017/aaq.2017.36 · DOI
- Stark Barbara L., 1997, SAA Bulletin, 15, 6
- 10.1179/sea.2014.33.2.009 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0000127 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10816-007-9038-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02545-4 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0188403 · DOI
- VanDerwarker Amber M, 2018, California Archaeology, 10
- Victor Katherine, 1992, Exploring Gender through Archaeology, 11
- 10.2307/3557080 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212 · DOI
- Wright Rita P., 2002, The SAA Archaeological Record, 2, 18
- 10.1086/649268 · DOI
- Yellen John, 1983, The Socio-Politics of Archaeology, 59
- 10.1525/ap3a.1994.5.1.53 · DOI
- Zeder Melinda, 1997, The American Archaeologist: A Profile
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Kelvin, L., & Hodgetts, L. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Archaeology · doi:10.51270/44.1.1 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Bardolph, D. N.
- Affiliations
- Department of Anthropology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-3201
- Venue
- California Archaeology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-07-03
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 159-186
- ISSN
- 1947-461X
- 1947-4628
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review