Cited by 18

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Controlling the Narrative: A Comparative Examination of Gendered Publishing Trends in the SCA and Beyond

Bardolph, Dana N.·2018·California Archaeology

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between gender and authorship in conference presentations and publications as a lens to examine current disciplinary sociopolitics and the relative contributions of men and women in California archaeology. I contextualize this analysis within a broader comparison to other regions, including Southeastern archaeology as well as the North American archaeology community at large. I also examine how occupational affiliation in different sectors of archaeology (including academic, agency, museums, private sector/CRM, and others) bears on publishing trends. An evaluation of publishing trends serves as a means to investigate academic merit and visibility, along with the production and validation of knowledge in California archaeology and beyond. Despite growing parity in the numbers of women represented in professional organizations and presenting research at regional and national conferences, disparities remain with respect to publication in peer-reviewed journals, including in Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology, California Archaeology, Southeastern Archaeology, and American Antiquity. I explore possible reasons for these disparities, including links to occupational affiliation, and conclude with some recommendations for change.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1947461x.2018.1535813

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Women are disadvantaged compared to men in archaeology, including lower rates of lead-authorship, publication in top-tier journals, citation, grant submission, hiring at PhD granting institutions, and holding CRM permits.

    “Many indicators suggest that women are disadvantaged compared to men in the discipline, including their lower rates of lead-authorship, publication in top-tier journals, citation, grant submission, hiring at PhD granting institutions, and holding CRM permits (e.g., Bardolph 2018;Fulkerson and Tushingham 2019;Goldstein et al. 2018;Hutson 2002;Jalbert 2019;Speakman et al. 2018;Tushingham et al. 2017”

    From Unsettling Archaeology (2020) · cites this paper as Bardolph 2018

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. 10.1080/1947461X.2016.1249593 · DOI
  2. 10.7183/0002-7316.79.3.522 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/0734578X.2015.1113101 · DOI
  4. Baxter Jane E., 2005, The SAA Archaeological Record, 5, 7
  5. Beaudry Mary C., 1994, Women in Archaeology, 138
  6. 10.1177/000271629956100107 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pone.0189136 · DOI
  8. 10.1002/bies.20272 · DOI
  9. Brown Kaitlin, 2018, California Archaeology, 10
  10. Burkholder Jo Ellen, 2006, The SAA Archaeological Record, 6, 27
  11. 10.1177/1529100614541236 · DOI
  12. Claassen Cheryl, 1992, Exploring Gender Through Archaeology
  13. Claassen Cheryl, 1994, Women in Archaeology
  14. Claassen Cheryl, 1999, Journal Southeastern Archaeology. Southeastern Archaeology, 18, 85
  15. 10.1371/journal.pone.0102172 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Clarke Anne, 1993, Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, 191
  17. 10.1126/sciadv.1400005 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1007/s11759-005-0003-9 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s10816-007-9039-z · DOI
  20. Cusack Carole M., 1993, Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique, 232
  21. 10.1080/1947461X.2016.1250462 · DOI
  22. du Cros Hilary, 1993, Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique
  23. 10.1353/rhe.1996.0027 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/280492 · DOI
  25. 10.1525/ap3a.1994.5.1.157 · DOI
  26. 10.1017/aaq.2017.73 · DOI
  27. Hutson Scott R., 1998, SAA Bulletin, 16, 19
  28. 10.2307/2694570 · DOI
  29. 10.1371/journal.pone.0049682 · DOI
  30. 10.1038/504211a · DOI
  31. 10.1179/sea.2014.33.2.008 · DOI
  32. 10.1017/S0020818313000209 · DOI
  33. McElhinney Bonnie, 2003, Language in Society, 32, 299, 10.1017/S0047404503323012 · DOI
  34. 10.1017/aap.2018.23 · DOI
  35. Misra Joya, 2011, Academe, 97, 22
  36. 10.1017/S104909651000017X · DOI
  37. 10.1007/s10816-007-9033-5 · DOI
  38. Nelson Margaret C., 1994, Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology
  39. 10.1111/aman.12929 · DOI
  40. 10.1177/0003122414564008 · DOI
  41. Rautman Alison E., 2012, The SAA Archaeological Record, 12, 25
  42. Reddy Seetha, 2017, Society for California Archaeology Newsletter, 51, 19
  43. 10.1023/A:1015575616285 · DOI
  44. 10.1017/aaq.2017.36 · DOI
  45. Stark Barbara L., 1997, SAA Bulletin, 15, 6
  46. 10.1179/sea.2014.33.2.009 · DOI
  47. 10.1371/journal.pone.0000127 · DOI
  48. 10.1007/s10816-007-9038-0 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02545-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1371/journal.pone.0188403 · DOI
  51. VanDerwarker Amber M, 2018, California Archaeology, 10
  52. Victor Katherine, 1992, Exploring Gender through Archaeology, 11
  53. 10.2307/3557080 · DOI
  54. 10.1371/journal.pone.0066212 · DOI
  55. Wright Rita P., 2002, The SAA Archaeological Record, 2, 18
  56. 10.1086/649268 · DOI
  57. Yellen John, 1983, The Socio-Politics of Archaeology, 59
  58. 10.1525/ap3a.1994.5.1.53 · DOI
  59. Zeder Melinda, 1997, The American Archaeologist: A Profile

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bardolph, D. N.
Affiliations
Department of Anthropology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-3201
Venue
California Archaeology
Published
2018-07-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
159-186
ISSN
  • 1947-461X
  • 1947-4628
Cited by
18
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review