Cited by 206Recycled Aggregate Concrete PerformanceEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityConcrete and Cement Materials Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Environmental life cycle assessment of coarse natural and recycled aggregates for concrete

Estanqueiro, Bruno, Dinis Silvestre, José, de Brito, Jorge, Duarte Pinheiro, Manuel·2018·European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering

Abstract

Purpose: To present a comparative life cycle assessment (LCA) of natural and recycled coarse aggregates used in concrete production. Methods: LCA was used to compare the environmental impacts of three alternative of procurement of coarse aggregates for concrete production: extraction and processing of natural aggregates; recycling of demolished concrete either using a fixed or a mobile plant. Site-specific data supplied by companies were used to model the life cycle of these aggregates. A sensitivity analysis was also made for the critical stages of these three life cycles. Results and conclusion: This paper presents and analyses innovative LCA data of production of coarse aggregates, both natural and recycled (from mobile or fixed recycling plants). The recycling process of aggregates has to be optimised, following a selective demolition of buildings that maximises waste recovery, reuse and recycling. The use of these aggregates in the production of concrete is more favourable than natural aggregates only in terms of land use and respiratory inorganics, but coarse recycled aggregates can present a better environmental performance than natural ones if fine recycled aggregates are also used in concrete production instead of being sent to a landfill. These results are, however, very sensitive to the transportation distances.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/19648189.2016.1197161

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Barreiros A., 2003, Study of the profitability of the installation of a fixed CDW recycling plant (In Portuguese)
  2. Braunschweig A., 2011, Recycled concrete: Environmentally beneficial over virgin concrete? LCM 2011 – Towards life cycle sustainability management
  3. Drew L., 2004, Aggregate and the environment, Environmental awareness series 8
  4. Martins I., 2008, Use of CDW in concrete (In Portuguese)
  5. Sampaio J., 2002, Gravel: vigné quarry (in Portuguese)
  6. Sonigo P., 2010, Management of construction and demolition waste in the EU, stakeholders workshop
  7. Symonds Group Ltd, 1999, Construction and demolition waste management practices and their economic impacts
  8. TGC, 2007, Thai German cooperation, resource efficient C&DW management – concepts and strategies from abroad
  9. Vázquez E., 2006, Comisión 2, Grupo de Trabajo 2/5 Hormigón reciclado

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Estanqueiro, B., Dinis Silvestre, J., de Brito, J., & Duarte Pinheiro, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • CERIS, Department of Civil Engineering, Architecture and Georesources (DECivil), IST, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais 1, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal
Venue
European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering
Published
2016-06-27
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
429-449
ISSN
  • 1964-8189 (ISSN-L)
  • 2116-7214
OpenAlex
W2475251541
Cited by
206
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
13.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
European Journal of Environmental and Civil engineering (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Recycled Aggregate Concrete Performance
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
Keywords
recycled coarse aggregate, natural coarse aggregate, concrete production, aggregate recycling, demolition waste, land use, respiratory inorganics, recycled fine aggregate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review