CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 54

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Salivary microbiota in individuals with different levels of caries experience

Belstrøm, Daniel, Holmstrup, Palle, Fiehn, Nils-Erik, Kirkby, Nikolai, Kokaras, Alexis, Paster, Bruce J., Bardow, Allan·2017·Journal of Oral Microbiology
DOI 10.1080/20002297.2016.1270614PMC PMC5328370
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20002297.2016.1270614

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1. Salivary bacterial profiles in individuals with different levels of caries and caries experience. (a) Relative abundance of the 10 most predominant bacterial genera identified in saliva samples in each group. (b) Shannon index expressed as mean and range in each group. (c) Correspondence analysis visualized two-dimensionally with axes expressed as the two most crucial inertia values (cumulative inertia: 16.96%). Blue: healthy group; red: caries group.
Figure 1. Salivary bacterial profiles in individuals with different levels of caries and caries experience. (a) Relative abundance of the 10 most predominant bacterial genera identified in saliva samples in each group. (b) Shannon index expressed as mean and range in each group. (c) Correspondence analysis visualized two-dimensionally with axes expressed as the two most crucial inertia values (cumulative inertia: 16.96%). Blue: healthy group; red: caries group.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Figure 2. Salivary bacterial profiles in caries-free individuals with different levels of caries experience. (a) Relative abundance of the 10 most predominant bacterial genera identified in saliva samples in caries-free individuals in each group. (b) Shannon index expressed as mean and range in caries-free individuals in each group. (c) Correspondence analysis visualized two-dimensionally with axes expressed as the with most crucial inertia values (cumulative inertia: 21.42%). Blue: healthy group; red: caries group.
Figure 2. Salivary bacterial profiles in caries-free individuals with different levels of caries experience. (a) Relative abundance of the 10 most predominant bacterial genera identified in saliva samples in caries-free individuals in each group. (b) Shannon index expressed as mean and range in caries-free individuals in each group. (c) Correspondence analysis visualized two-dimensionally with axes expressed as the with most crucial inertia values (cumulative inertia: 21.42%). Blue: healthy group; red: caries group.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1159/000339664 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6300(1999)11:3<327::AID-AJHB5>3.0.CO;2-M · DOI
  3. 10.1159/000016577 · DOI
  4. 10.1046/j..2003.com122.x · DOI
  5. 10.1159/000070450 · DOI
  6. 10.1111/j.1600-0757.2008.00288.x · DOI
  7. 10.1177/0022034511420434 · DOI
  8. 10.1177/00220345990780080601 · DOI
  9. 10.1101/gr.084616.108 · DOI
  10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0023352 · DOI
  11. 10.3402/jom.v6.23609 · DOI
  12. 10.1159/000357502 · DOI
  13. 10.3402/jom.v8.30170 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/jcpe.12190 · DOI
  15. 10.3109/00016357.2013.860621 · DOI
  16. 10.3109/00016357.2013.776701 · DOI
  17. Moller IJ, 1973, Scand J Dent Res, 81, 1
  18. 10.1016/j.joen.2015.08.022 · DOI
  19. Chen T, 2010, Database (Oxford), baq013
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1000080107 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/sim.4780090710 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1016/S0076-6879(06)11009-5 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60031-2 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1177/0022034510379602 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 54

Metadata

Authors
Belstrøm, D., Holmstrup, P., Fiehn, N.-E., Kirkby, N., Kokaras, A., Paster, B. J., & Bardow, A.
Venue
Journal of Oral Microbiology
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-01-01
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1270614
ISSN
2000-2297
DOI
10.1080/20002297.2016.1270614
PMC
PMC5328370
Cited by
54
References
1
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review