The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Inulin and Oligofructose as Dietary Fiber: A Review of the Evidence
Abstract
This critical review article examines the composition and source of inulin and oligofructose, the physiological effects of their consumption, and how these materials relate to the concept of dietary fiber. Inulin and oligofructose are fructans extracted on a commercial basis from the chicory root. Inulin has been defined as a polydisperse carbohydrate material consisting mainly, if not exclusively, of beta (2-1) fructosyl-fructose links ranging from 2 to 60 units long. Native chicory inulin has an average degree of polymerization (DP) of 10 to 20, whereas oligofructose contains chains of DP 2 to 10, with an average DP of 4. While a universally accepted definition for dietary fiber does not exist, it is generally agreed that this term includes saccharides (+ lignin) that are not hydrolyzed or absorbed in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract. These materials reach the colon, where they may be totally fermented, partially fermented, or remain unfermented. In addition, fibers contribute to fecal bulking. Inulin and oligofructose are not digested in the upper part of the gastrointestinal tract or are they absorbed and metabolized in the glycolytic pathway, or directly stored as glycogen like 'sugars' or starches. None of the molecules of fructose and glucose that form inulin and oligofructose appear in the portal blood. These materials are quantitatively fermented by the microflora of the colon; further, it has been demonstrated that this fermentation leads to the selective stimulation of the growth of the bifidobacteria population. After reviewing their chemistry, origin, and physiological effects, it is the opinion of the authors that inulin and oligofructose are dietary fiber. They share the basic common characteristics of dietary fibers, that is, saccharides of plant origin, resistance to digestion and absorption in the small intestine, and fermentation in the colon to produce short-chain fatty acids that are absorbed and metabolized in various parts of the body. Moreover, this fermentation induces a bulking effect.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The role of the gut microbiota in energy metabolism and metabolic disease
Cani, P., & Delzenne, N. (2009) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/138161209788168164 · Cited by 974
Mudgil, D., & Barak, S. (2013) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2013.06.044 · Cited by 699
van Hijum, S. A. F. T., Kralj, S., Ozimek, L. K., Dijkhuizen, L., & van Geel-Schutten, I. G. H. (2006) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.70.1.157-176.2006 · Cited by 466
Recent trends in the microbial production, analysis and application of Fructooligosaccharides
Sangeetha, P. T., Ramesh, M. N., & Prapulla, S. G. (2005) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2005.05.003 · Cited by 351
Müller, M., Canfora, E., & Blaak, E. (2018) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu10030275 · Cited by 329
Metadata
- Authors
- Flamm, G., Glinsmann, W., Kritchevsky, D., Prosky, L., & Roberfroid, M.
- Venue
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2001-09
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 353-362
- ISSN
- 1040-8398 (ISSN-L)
- 1549-7852
- OpenAlex
- W2006178815
- Cited by
- 396
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inulin and Oligofructose as Dietary Fiber: A Review of the Evidence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/20014091091841
- The paper
- Flamm, G., Glinsmann, W., Kritchevsky, D., Prosky, L., & Roberfroid, M. (2001). Inulin and Oligofructose as Dietary Fiber: A Review of the Evidence. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.1080/20014091091841
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.