CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 31

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

African American descendants, community outreach, and the Ransom and Sarah Williams Farmstead Project

Franklin, Maria, Lee, Nedra·2020·Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage
DOI 10.1080/20518196.2020.1718408
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

We participated in the research of a post-emancipation African American site in Texas that involved a community outreach programme with local descendants. We worked with the descendant community in producing knowledge and defining project outcomes, both of which benefitted the research and raised the public visibility of black Texas history and archaeology. Based on our experiences, we discuss how cultural resource management (CRM) firms can play an important role in diversifying the profession, and in engendering a long-term commitment to public archaeology among their employees. There were challenges we encountered working within the context of CRM, including funding allocations and enlisting local descendants in the site excavation, yet we hope that this case study helps to promote community archaeology in future CRM projects.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20518196.2020.1718408

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • African American archaeology has been at the forefront of collaborative research, digital innovation, and expanded understanding of what constitutes archaeological data.

    “As already discussed, with respect to archaeological methods, African American archaeology has been at the forefront of collaborative research (see, in addition, Franklin & Lee 2020, Jenkins 2022, Reeves 2022, Westmont 2021), digital innovation (González-Tennant 2016, González-Tennant & González-Tennant 2016), and even an expanded understanding of what constitutes “archaeological” data (Arjona 201”

    From African American Archaeology, for Now (2022) · cites this paper as Franklin & Lee 2020

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. 10.1007/BF03376789 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Atalay Sonya., 2012, Community-based Archaeology: Research with, by, and for Indigenous and Local Communities, 10.1525/9780520953468 · DOI
  3. Atalay Sonya, 2014, Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects, 7
  4. 10.1007/BF03376635 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.17730/humo.70.4.w0373w8655574266 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/BF03376785 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Connaughton Sean P., 2014, Canadian Journal of Archaeology / Journal Canadien d’Archéologie, 38, 541
  8. Davidson James M., 2012, The Oxford Handbook of Public Archaeology, 605
  9. 10.1007/s11759-011-9181-9 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/BF03374233 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Little Barbara J., 2010, Voices in American Archaeology, 131
  12. 10.1007/s11759-011-9179-3 · DOI
  13. McCarthy John P., 1996, Public Archaeology Review, 4, 3
  14. 10.1080/0043824022000007116 · DOI · Paper page
  15. McDavid Carol., 2010, Archaeologists As Activists: Can Archaeologists Change the World?, 36
  16. 10.1007/BF03376848 · DOI
  17. McDavid Carol, 2016, Public Archaeology, From Outreach and Education to Critique and Global Justice, 9
  18. McDavid Carol, 2010, Handbook of Postcolonial Archaeology, 467
  19. 10.1080/0043824022000007071 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Nicholas George P., 2014, Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects, 133
  21. 10.1007/BF03376822 · DOI
  22. Reeves Matthew B., 2004, Places in Mind: Public Archaeology as Applied Anthropology, 71
  23. Roberts Daniel G., 1995, Bodies of Evidence: Reconstructing History through Skeletal Analysis, 19
  24. Saitta Dean J., 2007, Archaeology and Capitalism: From Ethics to Politics, 267
  25. 10.1007/BF03376779 · DOI
  26. 10.1007/s11759-019-09380-9 · DOI
  27. 10.1179/2051819614Z.00000000019 · DOI
  28. Stottman M. Jay., 2014, Transforming Archaeology: Activist Practices and Prospects, 179
  29. Texas Beyond History, 2014, Ransom and Sarah Williams Farmstead
  30. 10.1179/175355307X243645 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Franklin, M., & Lee, N.
Affiliations
  • Department of Anthropology, University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
  • Department of Anthropology, University of Massachusetts, Boston, MA, USA
Venue
Journal of Community Archaeology & Heritage
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2020-01-29
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
135-148
ISSN
  • 2051-8196
  • 2051-820X
DOI
10.1080/20518196.2020.1718408
Cited by
31
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review