The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maize (Zea mays) Cob Phytoliths From A Central Kansas Great Bend Aspect Archaeological Site
Abstract
This study describes diagnostic maize cob phytoliths. The classification was derived from a comparative study of an extensive phytolith reference collection of traditional cultigens and native Kansas flora. Phytolith isolates from sediment samples collected in a Great Bend Aspect village (14MN328) in central Kansas were analyzed to test the feasibility of recovering maize cob phytoliths in an archaeological site in the Great Plains. Diagnostic maize cob phytoliths were identified in two of the seven samples studied.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The distinctive presence of wavy-topped rondels found in the cobs and fruit cases of maize serves as a diagnostic indicator for cultivated maize.
“Specifically, the distinctive presence of wavy-topped rondels found in the cobs and fruit cases of maize serve as a diagnostic indicator for cultivated maize”
From An integrative approach to ancient agricultural terraces and forms of dependency: the case of cutamalla in the prehispanic andes (2024) · cites this paper as Bozarth, 1998
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mader, C., Godde, P., Behl, M., Binder, C., Hägele, E., Isla, J., Leceta, F., Lyons, M., Marsh, E., Odenthal, R., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Archaeology · doi:10.3389/fearc.2024.1328315 · Cited by 18
Leceta, F., Binder, C., Mader, C., Mächtle, B., Marsh, E., Dietrich, L., Reindel, M., Eitel, B., & Meister, J. (2024) · Soil · doi:10.5194/soil-10-727-2024 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Bozarth, S.
- Affiliations
- Department of Geography, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS
- Venue
- Plains Anthropologist
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1998-11
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 166
- Pages
- 279-286
- ISSN
- 0032-0447
- 2052-546X
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
