CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 24

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The identification of archaeological eggshell using peptide markers

Presslee, Samantha, Wilson, Julie, Woolley, Jos, Best, Julia, Russell, Douglas, Radini, Anita, Fischer, Roman, Kessler, Benedikt, Boano, Rosa, Collins, Matthew, Demarchi, Beatrice·2017·STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research
DOI 10.1080/20548923.2018.1424300
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20548923.2018.1424300

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ZooMS is typically applied to fragmented or morphologically nondiagnostic bone fragments and has also been applied to parchments, ivory, eggshell, combs, and leather objects.

    “For archeological questions, this analysis not only is typically applied to fragmented or morphologically nondiagnostic bone fragments but also has been applied to a range of other archeological material culture, including parchments (52–54), ivory (55), eggshell (19, 22), combs (56), and leather objects (57).”

    From Ancient protein analysis in archaeology (2021) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. Apolinaire E., 2010, MAMUL Mapu: Past and Present from Archeology Pampeana, 370
  2. 10.1002/jez.b.21366 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.jasrep.2015.11.024 · DOI
  4. Browning J., 2009, Excavations at Freeschool Lane, Highcross
  5. Buckley R., 2015, Medieval Leicestershire
  6. 10.1016/j.ab.2007.12.002 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/rcm.4316 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/978-3-319-64763-0_12 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.jas.2013.08.021 · DOI
  10. Connor A., 1999, Roman and Medieval Occupation in Causeway Lane, Leicester
  11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0084112 · DOI
  12. 10.7554/eLife.17092 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1186/s12864-015-1333-7 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/pmic.201400436 · DOI
  15. 10.1074/jbc.274.46.32915 · DOI
  16. 10.1007/BF00298593 · DOI
  17. 10.1021/ac020347f · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1002/rcm.3679 · DOI
  19. 10.4324/9781315817729 · DOI
  20. 10.1126/science.1253451 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.011 · DOI
  22. 10.1080/14614103.2016.1263374 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.zool.2007.11.005 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0305-4403(81)90032-7 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jas.2011.02.014 · DOI
  26. Kuhn B. F., 2015, Palaeontol. Electronica, 18, 1
  27. 10.1074/jbc.M201518200 · DOI
  28. 10.1080/00071660400001157 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/pmic.200700397 · DOI
  30. 10.1186/s12953-015-0086-1 · DOI
  31. 10.1186/1477-5956-11-40 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.bbapap.2003.09.006 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/j.jprot.2014.09.024 · DOI
  34. Medina M. E., 2011, Archaeofauna, 20, 157, 10.15366/archaeofauna2011.20.009 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.12.011 · DOI
  36. Morris M., 2011, Visions of Ancient Leicester. Reconstructing Life in the Roman and Medieval Town from the Archaeology of the Highcross Leicester Excavations
  37. 10.1016/j.crpv.2004.08.002 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.gca.2006.01.004 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.quageo.2007.07.001 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Radini A., 2009, Excavation at Freeschool Lane. Leicester Highcross Project, 140
  41. Russell D., 2010, Journal of Afrotropical Zoology, 6, 77
  42. 10.1021/ie50297a018 · DOI
  43. 10.1371/journal.pone.0183053 · DOI
  44. 10.1017/S0003598X00062141 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1021/ac4026362 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1002/oa.2362 · DOI
  47. 10.1016/j.jas.2012.11.007 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1021/ac100818g · DOI
  49. 10.1016/0146-6380(95)00086-0 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1179/pma.1981.003 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/j.jas.2013.07.026 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1002/rcm.6821 · DOI
  53. 10.1038/nature14249 · DOI · Paper page
  54. 10.1074/mcp.M111.010587 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Presslee, S., Wilson, J., Woolley, J., Best, J., Russell, D., Radini, A., Fischer, R., Kessler, B., Boano, R., Collins, M., & Demarchi, B.
Affiliations
  • Department of Archaeology, University of York, York, UK
  • Department of Mathematics, University of York, York, UK
  • Independent researcher
  • Department of Archaeology, Anthropology and Forensic Science, Bournemouth University, Poole, UK
  • Bird Group, Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, Hertfordshire, UK
  • Nuffield Department of Medicine, Target Discovery Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
  • Department of Life Sciences and Systems Biology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
ORCID
Venue
STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2017-01
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
89-99
ISSN
2054-8923
DOI
10.1080/20548923.2018.1424300
Cited by
24
References
2
Language
en
Funders
  • EPSRC (EP/I001514/1)
  • National Science Foundation (03.016.3333.616)
  • Italian Ministry of Education, Universities and Research Programme (AH/L006979/1)
  • Arts and Humanities Research Council (AH/L006979/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review