Cited by 32Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and IdentificationConsumer Market Behavior and PricingFashion and Cultural Textiles

Economic Psychology and Fashion Marketing Theory Appraising Veblen’s Theory of Conspicuous Consumption

Woodside, Arch G.·2012·Journal of Global Fashion Marketing

Abstract

The study here serves to examine customer choice and firm profitability outcomes from the conjoining of four perspectives: economics, fashion, marketing, and psychology. This article describes core tenets of fashion marketing theory (FMT) from the perspective of economic psychology. The study here is unique and valuable in proposing empirically testable hypotheses that follow from FMT and in describing evidence from available literature testing these hypotheses. The core tenets reflect the view that impactful fashion marketing moderates the relationships among price and consumer demand for the firm’s offering (i.e., brand) by psychological customer segments, and subsequently firm profitability. Relating to fashion marketing, “psychology” in “economic psychology” includes the influences of chronic desire for conspicuous consumption (CC) and desire for rarity as relative human conditions, that is, humans vary in these desires; consumers relatively very high versus very low in these desires are more prone to enact conspicuous choices whatever the price level of the object or service. Consequently, different pricing points (decisions) that maximize profitability vary considerably for product designs which are positioned high in CC and rarity directed to customers very high in chronic desire for CC and rarity versus product designs which are positioned low in CC and rarity directed to customers very low in chronic desire for CC and rarity. The study offers an interesting applicati…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20932685.2012.10593107

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Clothing is mostly consumed conspicuously, as these products are on public display when in use.

    “Since conspicuous motives may drive consumers to choose green products over non-green alternatives, this may especially be the case for fashion products, because clothing-by its nature-is mostly consumed conspicuously, as these products are on public display when in use.Clothing has been shown to function as a conspicuous symbol (Lewis & Moital, 2016;Rahman et al., 2010;Woodside, 2012).”

    From Sustainable clothing: Why conspicuous consumption and greenwashing matter (2023) · cites this paper as Woodside, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Woodside, A. G.
Affiliations
Boston College (US)
Corresponding author
Woodside, Arch G.
Venue
Journal of Global Fashion Marketing
Published
2012-05
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
55-60
ISSN
  • 2093-2685 (ISSN-L)
  • 2325-4483
OpenAlex
W2086552268
Cited by
32
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Global Fashion Marketing (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Fashion and Cultural Textiles
Keywords
conspicuous consumption, Thorstein Veblen, economic psychology, customer segmentation, pricing, consumer choice, firm profitability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review