Cited by 34Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesTechnology Use by Older Adults

Telehealth for patients with Parkinson's disease: delivering efficient and sustainable long-term care

Barbour, Peter J., Arroyo, Jill, High, Star, Fichera, Lisa B., Staska-Pier, Marie M., McMahon, Mary Kay·2016·Hospital Practice

Abstract

Objectives We set out to demonstrate the benefits of providing long-term care via telehealth for patients with Parkinson's disease living in continuous care facilities. Methods A cohort of 16 patients with Parkinson's disease residing at one of 2 locations of a multi-facility continuous care retirement organization were seen virtually in follow-up over a 3-year period by Telehealth Services at a large, academic, tertiary care hospital in southeastern Pennsylvania. The data collected during that period, studied retrospectively, included demographic information, number of telehealth visits, and UPDRS scores obtained at each visit. Satisfaction and potential cost savings were also reviewed. Results UPDRS scores declined over the period of observation, from a range of 18-60 at study start to 28-72 at study end. Actual cost savings are difficult to define; however, the cost per telehealth visit at $117.30 was often lower than the facility's average cost for transporting patients to a visit in the neurologist's office. Patients, families, subspecialists, and the nursing staff expressed uniformly high satisfaction with telehealth. Conclusion This model for providing care proved to be sustainable and efficient, and promoted collaboration among the providers at the long-term care facility and those at the remote site. These benefits may be applicable to patients with degenerative disorders in similar settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21548331.2016.1166922

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Remotely delivered assessments for PD patients in care facilities have demonstrated high patient and family satisfaction and cost-effectiveness compared to transporting patients for face-to-face neurologist appointments.

    “remotely delivered assessments for PD patients in care facilities have demonstrated high patient and family satisfaction in addition to cost-effectiveness compared to transporting patients for face-to-face neurologist appointments (Barbour et al., 2016”

    From Remote delivery of psychological interventions for Parkinson's disease. (2018) · cites this paper as Barbour et al., 2016

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barbour, P. J., Arroyo, J., High, S., Fichera, L. B., Staska-Pier, M. M., & McMahon, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Lehigh Valley Health Network (US)
  • Allentown Public Library (US)
  • Teledyne FLIR (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Barbour, Peter J.
Venue
Hospital Practice
Published
2016-03-14
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
92-97
ISSN
  • 0018-5809 (ISSN-L)
  • 2154-8331
  • 2377-1003
OpenAlex
W2299909935
Cited by
34
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hospital Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
This project required no funding.
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, telemedicine, long-term care, UPDRS scores, cost reduction, patient satisfaction
MeSH terms
Aged, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Pennsylvania, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cohort Studies, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Remote Consultation, Disease Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review