Cited by 235Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationHealthcare Systems and TechnologyTechnology Use by Older Adults

Randomized controlled clinical trial of “virtual house calls” for Parkinson disease

Open access
Dorsey, E. Ray, Venkataraman, Vinayak, Grana, Matthew J., Bull, Michael T., George, Benjamin P., Boyd, Cynthia M., Beck, Christopher A., Rajan, Balaraman +2 more·2013·JAMA Neurology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: The burden of neurological disorders is increasing, but access to care is limited. Providing specialty care to patients via telemedicine could help alleviate this growing problem. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility, effectiveness, and economic benefits of using web-based videoconferencing (telemedicine) to provide specialty care to patients with Parkinson disease in their homes. DESIGN: A 7-month, 2-center, randomized controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Patients' homes and outpatient clinics at 2 academic medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty patients with Parkinson disease with Internet access at home. INTERVENTION: Care from a specialist delivered remotely at home or in person in the clinic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome variable was feasibility, as measured by the percentage of telemedicine visits completed as scheduled. Secondary outcome measures included clinical benefit, as measured by the 39-item Parkinson Disease Questionnaire, and economic value, as measured by time and travel. RESULTS: Twenty participants enrolled in the study and were randomly assigned to telemedicine (n = 9) or in-person care (n = 11). Of the 27 scheduled telemedicine visits, 25 (93%) were completed, and of the 33 scheduled in-person visits, 30 (91%) were completed (P = .99). In this small study, the change in quality of life did not differ for those randomly assigned to telemedicine compared with those randomly assigned to in-person care (4.0-point improvement vs 6.4-point improvement; P = .61). Compared with in-person visits, each telemedicine visit saved participants, on average, 100 miles of travel and 3 hours of time. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Using web-based videoconferencing to provide specialty care at home is feasible, provides value to patients, and may offer similar clinical benefit to that of in-person care. Larger studies are needed to determine whether the clinical benefits are indeed comparable to those of in-person care and whether the results observed are generalizable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01476306.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.123

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Pilot studies involving telehealth-based specialist care delivery through virtual house calls have demonstrated feasibility and considerable savings in travel distance and time for PD patients.

    “Pilot studies involving telehealth-based specialist care delivery through “virtual house calls” have demonstrated feasibility and considerable savings in travel distance and time for PD patients (Dorsey et al., 2013”

    From Remote delivery of psychological interventions for Parkinson's disease. (2018) · cites this paper as Dorsey et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. [1]Dorsey ER Constantinescu R Thompson JP Projected number of people with Parkinson disease in the most populous nations, 2005 through 2030 Neurology 2007 68 384 386 17082464
  2. [2]Willis AW Schootman M Evanoff BA Perlmutter JS Racette BA Neurologist care in Parkinson disease: a utilization, outcomes, and survival study Neurology 2011 77 851 857 21832214 PMC3162639
  3. [3]Cheng EM Swarztrauber K Siderowf AD Association of specialist involvement and quality of care for Parkinson’s disease Mov Disord 2007 22 515 522 17260340
  4. [4]Dorsey ER Voss TS Shprecher DR A U.S. survey of patients with Parkinson’s disease: satisfaction with medical care and support groups Mov Disord 2010 25 2128 2135 20824736
  5. [5]Samii A Ryan-Dykes P Tsukuda RA Zink C Franks R Nichol WP Telemedicine for delivery of health care in Parkinson’s disease J Telemed Telecare 2006 12 16 18 16438773
  6. [7]Hubble JP Pahwa R Michalek DK Thomas C Koller WC Interactive video conferencing: a means of providing interim care to Parkinson’s disease patients Mov Disord 1993 8 380 382 8341308
  7. [8]Cubo E Gabriel-Galan JM Martinez JS Comparison of office-based versus home Web-based clinical assessments for Parkinson’s disease Mov Disord 2012 27 308 311 22173694
  8. [9]Goetz CG Stebbins GT Wolff D Testing objective measures of motor impairment in early Parkinson’s disease: Feasibility study of an at-home testing device Mov Disord 2009 24 551 556 19086085 PMC4161502
  9. [10]Biglan KM Voss TS Deuel LM Telemedicine for the care of nursing home residents with Parkinson’s disease Mov Disord 2009 24 1073 1076 19353687
  10. [11]Dorsey ER Deuel LM Voss TS Increasing access to specialty care: a pilot, randomized controlled trial of telemedicine for Parkinson’s disease Mov Disord 2010 25 1652 1659 20533449
  11. [12]Rubin MN Wellik KE Channer DD Demaerschalk BM Systematic review of teleneurology: methodology Front Neurol 2012 3 156 23162527 PMC3497715
  12. [13]Larner AJ Teleneurology: an overview of current status Pract Neurol 2011 11 283 288 21921003
  13. [14]Silva GS Farrell S Shandra E Viswanathan A Schwamm LH The status of telestroke in the United States: a survey of currently active stroke telemedicine programs Stroke 2012 43 2078 2085 22700532
  14. [15]Meyer BC Raman R Hemmen T Efficacy of site-independent telemedicine in the STRokE DOC trial: a randomised, blinded, prospective study Lancet Neurol 2008 7 787 795 18676180 PMC2744128
  15. [18]Peto V Jenkinson C Fitzpatrick R Greenhall R The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson’s disease Qual Life Res 1995 4 241 248 7613534
  16. [19]Fahn S Oakes D Shoulson I Levodopa and the progression of Parkinson’s disease N Engl J Med 2004 351 2498 2508 15590952
  17. [20]Gill DJ Freshman A Blender JA Ravina B The Montreal cognitive assessment as a screening tool for cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease Mov Disord 2008 23 1043 1046 18381646
  18. [21]Glasgow RE Wagner EH Schaefer J Mahoney LD Reid RJ Greene SM Development and validation of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) Med Care 2005 43 436 444 15838407
  19. [23]Abdolahi ASN Dorsey ER Biglan KM Potential reliability and validity of a modified version of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale that could be administered remotely Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2012 In Press PMC3666325 23102808
  20. [25]Williams A Gill S Varma T Deep brain stimulation plus best medical therapy versus best medical therapy alone for advanced Parkinson’s disease (PD SURG trial): a randomised, open-label trial Lancet Neurol 2010 9 581 591 20434403 PMC2874872
  21. [27]Charles BL Telemedicine can lower costs and improve access Healthc Financ Manage 2000 54 66 69 10915354
  22. [33]Prioritization CoCER, Medicine Io Initial National Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Research The National Academies Press 2009
  23. [35]Norman J Washington Health Policy Week in Review Telemedicine Supporters Launch New Effort for Doctor Licensing Across State Lines The Commonwealth Fund 2 6 2012
  24. [38]Glaser M Winchell T Plant P Provider satisfaction and patient outcomes associated with a statewide prison telemedicine program in Louisiana Telemed J E Health 2010 16 472 479 20438385
  25. [40]Flewelling C Ingram CA Telepediatrics in Canada: an overview Telemed J E Health 2004 10 357 368 15650530
  26. [43]Noyes K Liu H Li Y Holloway R Dick AW Economic burden associated with Parkinson’s disease on elderly Medicare beneficiaries Mov Disord 2006 21 362 372 16211621
  27. [44]Shulman LM Gruber-Baldini AL Anderson KE Fishman PS Reich SG Weiner WJ The clinically important difference on the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale Arch Neurol 2010 67 64 70 20065131
  28. [45]Follett KA Weaver FM Stern M Pallidal versus subthalamic deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease N Engl J Med 2010 362 2077 2091 20519680
  29. [46]Dorsey ER Deuel LM Beck CA Group patient visits for Parkinson disease: a randomized feasibility trial Neurology 2011 76 1542 1547 21525426 PMC3100128
  30. [47]Dahodwala N Xie M Noll E Siderowf A Mandell DS Treatment disparities in Parkinson’s disease Ann Neurol 2009 66 142 145 19743462 PMC2856321

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorsey, E. R., Venkataraman, V., Grana, M. J., Bull, M. T., George, B. P., Boyd, C. M., Beck, C. A., Rajan, B., Seidmann, A., & Biglan, K. M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • University of Rochester (US)
Corresponding author
Dorsey, E. Ray
Venue
JAMA Neurology
Published
2013-05-01
Volume
70
Issue
5
Pages
565
ISSN
2168-6149 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2022635697
Cited by
235
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5
FWCI
18.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (K23AG032910)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
Parkinson's disease, telemedicine, videoconferencing, home care, feasibility, quality of life, travel time, economic value, health care access
MeSH terms
Aged, Feasibility Studies, House Calls, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Telemedicine, Videoconferencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review