Cited by 11Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMental Health Treatment and Access

Perceptions of an AI-Supported Mobile App for Military Health in the Canadian Armed Forces

Tam-Seto, Linna, Wood, Valerie M., Linden, Brooke, Stuart, Heather·2021·Military Behavioral Health

Abstract

Recent developments in technology have expanded its reach and application, particularly when it comes to supporting mental health and well-being. The emergence and popularity of mental health mobile applications have created opportunities to reach those who face challenges with accessing traditional face-to-face supports such as members of the military community. Despite the increasing availability of technology-based mental health supports, perceptions toward this resource is unknown, particularly when it comes to technology that utilizes artificial intelligence (AI). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the perceptions of the use of an AI-supported mental health app by the Canadian military community. This qualitative study used a combination of in-depth, semi-structured individual interviews, focus groups, and survey free-text responses. A total of 44 individuals participated in this study including military family members, veterans, health care providers working with veterans, and staff working with military families. The results have been presented in this paper as potential benefits and potential drawbacks of using an AI-supported mental health application. This information may have an important contribution to our growing understanding of how AI-supported technology is perceived through the unique experiences and lens of the military community. Understanding the various perceptions of technology will help inform the direction of expanding mental health services for a population who may be faced with geographic isolation or stigma that affect accessing mental health services. Further research is required to understand how AI-supported mental health applications can be best used with the military community.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21635781.2020.1838364

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tam-Seto, L., Wood, V. M., Linden, B., & Stuart, H.
Affiliations
  • Centre for International and Defence Policy, Queen’s University
  • Queen's University (CA)
Venue
Military Behavioral Health
Published
2020-11-13
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
247-254
ISSN
  • 2163-5781 (ISSN-L)
  • 2163-5803
OpenAlex
W3104694101
Cited by
11
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Military Behavioral Health (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • IBM Canada
  • Canadian Institute for Military and Veteran Health Research
  • Mitacs
  • Southern Ontario Smart Computing Innovation Platform
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
artificial intelligence, military mental health, Canadian Armed Forces, user perception, veterans, military families, access to mental health care, stigma, geographic isolation, technology acceptance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review