Cited by 39Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Utility of the T2 Mood Tracker Mobile Application Among Army Warrior Transition Unit Service Members

Bush, Nigel E., Ouellette, Gary, Kinn, Julie·2014·Military Medicine

Abstract

Many military personnel returning from deployment experience increases in psychological symptoms, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and mood changes. Patient health diaries are commonly used for self-reporting over time away from the clinic. "T2 Mood Tracker" is an application ("app") for smartphones and other mobile devices that enables users to rate their moods, to self-monitor across time, and to report their emotional experiences to health providers. We designed T2 Mood Tracker to track symptoms associated with deployment-related behavioral health issues, including PTSD, Head Injury, Stress, Depression, Anxiety, and General Well-Being. We field-tested T2 Mood Tracker with a small sample of redeployed soldiers under treatment for behavioral health issues at a Warrior Transition Unit. Participants used the app an average of 10 different days over the 2- to 3-week test period. Consensus was that T2 Mood Tracker was easy to use, useful and beneficial. The majority said they would use the app in the future, would recommend it to other service members, and would use the app to share their mood information with a provider. Warrior Transition Unit providers were enthusiastic about the potential of T2 Mood Tracker as a tool for use with their patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.7205/milmed-d-14-00271

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bush, N. E., Ouellette, G., & Kinn, J.
Venue
Military Medicine
Published
2014-12
Volume
179
Issue
12
Pages
1453-1457
ISSN
  • 0026-4075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-613X
OpenAlex
W2330003367
Cited by
39
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2
FWCI
2.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Military Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
mobile health apps, mood tracking, self-monitoring, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, traumatic brain injury, stress, well-being, patient-reported outcomes, user acceptance
MeSH terms
Affect, Anxiety, Attitude of Health Personnel, Consumer Behavior, Depression, Humans, Military Personnel, United States, Patient Satisfaction, Cell Phone, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review