The Reuters Institute’s Digital News Report 2012
Abstract
Nic Newman (Ed.) Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism, University of Oxford, 2012 64 pp., accessible at http://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk The best thing about large surveys...
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
While 'fake news' may be thought of as a primarily US-centric concern, the survey results show that the term is also interpreted by UK respondents as speaking to similar issues of truthfulness and trustworthiness of news.
“While”
From Falling for Fake News: Investigating the Consumption of News via Social Media (2018) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Journalists as interpretive communities
Zelizer, B. (1993) · Critical Studies in Mass Communication · doi:10.1080/15295039309366865 · Cited by 856 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Falling for Fake News: Investigating the Consumption of News via Social Media
Flintham, M., Karner, C., Bachour, K., Creswick, H., Gupta, N., & Moran, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173950 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cokley, J.
- Affiliations
- Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Cokley, John
- ORCID
- Cokley, John
- Venue
- Digital Journalism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 286-287
- ISSN
- 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-082X
- OpenAlex
- W2090693004
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
- Type
- book review
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Digital Journalism (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
- Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
- Keywords
- online news, news media, digital journalism, news consumption
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
