The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 60 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modelling Contemporary Gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination
Open accessAbstract
Gatekeeping theory struggles to describe the rise of algorithms and users as information selectors in digital spaces. Algorithms and users may co-exist as decision-makers and reach high visibility through decentralised gatekeeping mechanisms. Classic gatekeeping theory is no longer adequate in describing contemporary news selection processes online and recent gatekeeping approaches at theory-building are isolated and have not been synthesised in a coherent gatekeeping theory. This theoretical paper addresses this issue and develops a digital gatekeeping model in three steps. First, four gatekeeper archetypes are identified that differ in access, selection criteria and publication choices. Second, gatekeeping frequently involves platforms on which gatekeepers operate. These platforms either apply gatekeeping mechanisms controlled by a central authority or rely on collaborations between many micro-level interactions to publish news. Third, a digital gatekeeping model is derived to model the four gatekeeper archetypes and their selection processes in relation to platforms employing collaborative gatekeeping mechanisms. This proposed digital gatekeeping model extends previous research on gatekeeping by synthesising classic gatekeeping theory with contemporary approaches and by providing a framework for future research on information control and dissemination.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What is Twitter, a social network or a news media?
Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., & Moon, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the 19th international conference on World wide web · doi:10.1145/1772690.1772751 · Cited by 6,652
(2011) · Cited by 4,430
Lewin, K. (1947) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872674700100103 · Cited by 3,493
Frontiers in Group Dynamics: II. Channels of Group Life; Social Planning and Action Research
Lewin, K. (1947) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/001872674700100201 · Cited by 2,265
Social and Heuristic Approaches to Credibility Evaluation Online
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Medders, R. B. (2010) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x · Cited by 1,394
The “Gate Keeper”: A Case Study in the Selection of News
White, D. M. (1950) · Journalism Quarterly · doi:10.1177/107769905002700403 · Cited by 1,250
News sharing in social media: The effect of gratifications and prior experience
Lee, C. S., & Ma, L. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.10.002 · Cited by 1,220
Shoemaker, P. J., & Vos, T. (2009) · doi:10.4324/9780203931653 · Cited by 1,079
Gillespie, T. (2014) · Media Technologies · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9042.003.0013 · Cited by 1,016
Information contagion: an empirical study of the spread of news on digg and twitter social networks
Lerman, K., & Ghosh, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v4i1.14021 · Cited by 813
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1177/107769906904600110 · doi:10.1177/107769906904600110
- 10.1007/978-3-531-91562-3 · doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91562-3
- Bui Cam Ly, 2010, Global Media Journal: American Edition, 9, 1
- 10.1007/978-3-319-04666-2 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-04666-2
- 10.1177/107769908906600405 · doi:10.1177/107769908906600405
- 10.1007/s11616-015-0230-z · doi:10.1007/s11616-015-0230-z
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262525374.003.0009 · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-8349-4009-4 · doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-4009-4
- Shoemaker Pamela J., 1991, Gatekeeping. Communication Concepts 3
- Shoemaker Pamela J., 2010, Brazilian Journalism Research, 6, 55
- 10.1080/21670811.2013.801686 · doi:10.1080/21670811.2013.801686
Cited by
Krupnikov, Y., & Ryan, J. B. (2022) · doi:10.1017/9781108923323 · Cited by 175
Quantified Audiences in News Production: A synthesis and research agenda
Zamith, R. (2018) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1444999 · Cited by 162
Negotiated Autonomy: The Role of Social Media Algorithms in Editorial Decision Making
Peterson-Salahuddin, C., & Diakopoulos, N. (2020) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.v8i3.3001 · Cited by 71
Makhortykh, M., Zucker, E. M., Simon, D. J., Bultmann, D., & Ulloa, R. (2023) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-023-00072-6 · Cited by 48
Fisher, C., Culloty, E., Lee, J. Y., & Park, S. (2019) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2018.1519375 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Wallace, J.
- Venue
- Digital Journalism
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-07-13
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 274-293
- ISSN
- 2167-0811 (ISSN-L)
- 2167-082X
- OpenAlex
- W2734389702
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 60
- FWCI
- 25.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modelling Contemporary Gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648
- The paper
- Wallace, J. (2018). Modelling Contemporary Gatekeeping: The rise of individuals, algorithms and platforms in digital news dissemination. Digital Journalism. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1343648
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.