Cited by 909Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 193 of the 194 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis - frontotemporal spectrum disorder (ALS-FTSD): Revised diagnostic criteria

Open access

Abstract

This article presents the revised consensus criteria for the diagnosis of frontotemporal dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) based on an international research workshop on frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and ALS held in London, Canada in June 2015. Since the publication of the Strong criteria, there have been considerable advances in the understanding of the neuropsychological profile of patients with ALS. Not only is the breadth and depth of neuropsychological findings broader than previously recognised - - including deficits in social cognition and language - but mixed deficits may also occur. Evidence now shows that the neuropsychological deficits in ALS are extremely heterogeneous, affecting over 50% of persons with ALS. When present, these deficits significantly and adversely impact patient survival. It is the recognition of this clinical heterogeneity in association with neuroimaging, genetic and neuropathological advances that has led to the current re-conceptualisation that neuropsychological deficits in ALS fall along a spectrum. These revised consensus criteria expand upon those of 2009 and embrace the concept of the frontotemporal spectrum disorder of ALS (ALS-FTSD).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21678421.2016.1267768

Cites

193 of 193 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 194 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1136/jnnp.61.5.450 · DOI
  2. Ince PG, 2015, Greenfield's Neuropathology, 817
  3. Le B,I, 2015, Neurobiol Aging, 36, 3116

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 401–500 of 908

Metadata

Authors
Strong, M. J., Abrahams, S., Goldstein, L. H., Woolley, S., Mclaughlin, P., Snowden, J., Mioshi, E., Roberts-South, A., Benatar, M., HortobáGyi, T., Rosenfeld, J., Silani, V., Ince, P. G., & Turner, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Euan MacDonald Centre for Motor Neuron Disease Research (GB)
  • King's College London (GB)
  • California Pacific Medical Center (US)
  • Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of East Anglia (GB)
  • Northwestern University, Roxelyn and Richard Pepper Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Evanston, IL, USA,
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of Debrecen (HU)
  • Loma Linda University Medical Center (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Strong, Michael J.
Venue
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
Published
2017-01-05
Volume
18
Issue
3-4
Pages
153-174
ISSN
  • 2167-8421 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-9223
OpenAlex
W2562172900
Cited by
909
References
194
Citations by year
2026: 90 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 108 · 2021: 118 · 2020: 101 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 25
FWCI
48.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • University of Debrecen Electronic Archive (University of Debrecen) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research
  • Motor Neurone Disease Association (TURNER/JAN13/944-795)
  • King's College London
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K026992/1, MR/K01014X/1)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U54NS092091)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, frontotemporal dementia, diagnostic criteria, neuropsychological deficits, social cognition, language deficits, cognitive heterogeneity, survival, consensus criteria
MeSH terms
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Canada, Diagnosis, Differential, Humans, Language, Neuropsychological Tests, Social Perception, Survival Analysis, Frontotemporal Dementia, Neuroimaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review