Cited by 88Transportation Planning and OptimizationInfrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability AnalysisRailway Systems and Energy Efficiency

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Beyond a complete failure: the impact of partial capacity degradation on public transport network vulnerability

Open access
Cats, Oded, Jenelius, Erik·2018·Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics

Abstract

Disruptions in public transport networks (PTNs) often lead to partial capacity reductions rather than complete closures. This study aims to move beyond the vulnerability analysis of complete failures by investigating the impacts of a range of capacity reductions on PTN performance. The relation between network performance and the degradation of line or link capacities is investigated by establishing a vulnerability curve and related metrics. The analysis framework is applied to a full-scan analysis of planned temporary line-level capacity reductions and an analysis of unplanned link-level capacity reductions on the most central segments in the multi-modal rapid PTN of Stockholm, Sweden. The impacts of capacity reductions are assessed using a non-equilibrium dynamic public transport operations and assignment model. The nonlinear properties of on-board crowding, denied boarding, network effects and route choice result in non-trivial, generally convex, relations which carry implications on disruption planning and real-time management.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/21680566.2016.1267596

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • BusMezzo assumes an explicit, disaggregate representation of PT system, which enables in-depth analysis of PT overcrowding and PT capacity reductions' effects on passengers' travel experience and network performance.

    “The BusMezzo model assumes an explicit, disaggregate representation of PT system, which enables in-depth analysis of the PT overcrowding (Cats et al. 2016) and PT capacity reductions’ (Cats and Jenelius 2018) effects on passengers’ travel experience and network performance.”

    From Mitigating bus bunching with real-time crowding information (2023) · cites this paper as Cats and Jenelius 2018

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. 10.1016/j.physa.2005.11.007 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009 · DOI
  3. 10.1140/epjb/e2009-00291-3 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.dss.2012.05.060 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/s13676-014-0070-4 · DOI
  6. 10.1007/s11067-014-9237-7 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Cats O., 2015, Transportation Research Part A, 81, 47
  8. 10.3141/2217-06 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Cats O., 2016, Transportation Research Part A, 86, 35
  10. 10.1016/j.trb.2016.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1002/atr.5670330207 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0191-2615(00)00048-5 · DOI
  13. Colak, S., H. Lus, and A. R. Atligan. 2010. “Vulnerability of Networks against Critical Links Failure.” http://arxiv.org/abs/1012.5961v2. · arXiv
  14. 10.1016/j.trc.2010.09.002 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/s12198-012-0092-9 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0969-6989(00)00003-5 · DOI
  17. 10.1068/a070921 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/23249935.2015.1087232 · DOI
  19. Jenelius E., 2006, Transportation Research Part A, 40, 537
  20. Li Y., 2014, International Journal of Geospatial Environmental Research, 1
  21. Mattsson L.-G., 2015, Transportation Research Part A, 81, 16
  22. 10.1209/0295-5075/80/68001 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.008 · DOI
  24. Sullivan J. L., 2010, Transportation Research Part A, 44, 323
  25. Taleb N. N., 2014, Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder
  26. 10.1016/j.trc.2010.02.008 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/01441647.2010.519127 · DOI
  28. Zhu S., 2010, Transportation Research Part A, 44, 771

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cats, O., & Jenelius, E.
Affiliations
KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
Corresponding author
Cats, Oded
Venue
Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics
Published
2016-12-15
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
77-96
ISSN
  • 2168-0566 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-0582
OpenAlex
W2562576779
Cited by
88
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportmetrica B Transport Dynamics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
Keywords
capacity reduction, vulnerability curves, network performance, denied boarding, route choice, rapid transit, Stockholm

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review