The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microfluidic organ-on-chip technology for blood-brain barrier research
Open accessAbstract
Organs-on-chips are a new class of microengineered laboratory models that combine several of the advantages of current in vivo and in vitro models. In this review, we summarize the advances that have been made in the development of organ-on-chip models of the blood-brain barrier (BBBs-on-chips) and the challenges that are still ahead. The BBB is formed by specialized endothelial cells and separates blood from brain tissue. It protects the brain from harmful compounds from the blood and provides homeostasis for optimal neuronal function [corrected]. Studying BBB function and dysfunction is important for drug development and biomedical research. Microfluidic BBBs-on-chips enable real-time study of (human) cells in an engineered physiological microenvironment, for example incorporating small geometries and fluid flow as well as sensors. Examples of BBBs-on-chips in literature already show the potential of more realistic microenvironments and the study of organ-level functions. A key challenge in the field of BBB-on-chip development is the current lack of standardized quantification of parameters such as barrier permeability and shear stress. This limits the potential for direct comparison of the performance of different BBB-on-chip models to each other and existing models. We give recommendations for further standardization in model characterization and conclude that the rapidly emerging field of BBB-on-chip models holds great promise for further studies in BBB biology and drug development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Astrocyte-endothelial interactions at the blood-brain barrier
Abbott, N. J., Rönnbäck, L., & Hansson, E. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1824 · Cited by 5,595
Reconstituting organ-level lung functions on a chip
Huh, D., Matthews, B. D., Mammoto, A., Montoya-Zavala, M., Hsin, H. Y., & Ingber, D. E. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1188302 · Cited by 4,250
Kim, H. J., Huh, D., Hamilton, G., & Ingber, D. E. (2012) · Lab on a Chip · doi:10.1039/c2lc40074j · Cited by 1,734
Can Animal Models of Disease Reliably Inform Human Studies?
van der Worp, H. B., Howells, D. W., Sena, E. S., Porritt, M. J., Rewell, S., O'Collins, V., & Macleod, M. R. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000245 · Cited by 1,354
Derivation of blood-brain barrier endothelial cells from human pluripotent stem cells
Lippmann, E. S., Azarin, S. M., Kay, J. E., Nessler, R. A., Wilson, H. K., Al-Ahmad, A., Palecek, S. P., & Shusta, E. V. (2012) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2247 · Cited by 800
Gut-on-a-Chip microenvironment induces human intestinal cells to undergo villus differentiation
Kim, H. J., & Ingber, D. E. (2013) · Integrative Biology · doi:10.1039/c3ib40126j · Cited by 750
Nedergaard, M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1240514 · Cited by 718
Preclinical research: Make mouse studies work
Perrin, S. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/507423a · Cited by 668
The blood-brain barrier: an engineering perspective
Wong, A. D., Ye, M., Levy, A. F., Rothstein, J. D., Bergles, D. E., & Searson, P. C. (2013) · Frontiers in Neuroengineering · doi:10.3389/fneng.2013.00007 · Cited by 662
Anatomy and physiology of the blood-brain barrier
Serlin, Y., Shelef, I., Knyazer, B., & Friedman, A. (2015) · Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcdb.2015.01.002 · Cited by 397
Cited by
Campisi, M., Shin, Y., Osaki, T., Hajal, C., Chiono, V., & Kamm, R. D. (2018) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.014 · Cited by 718
Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs): molecular mechanisms of induction and applications
Cerneckis, J., Cai, H., & Shi, Y. (2024) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01809-0 · Cited by 452
Development of Polymeric Nanoparticles for Blood–Brain Barrier Transfer—Strategies and Challenges
Zhang, W., Mehta, A., Tong, Z., Esser, L., & Voelcker, N. H. (2021) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202003937 · Cited by 430
Wevers, N. R., Kasi, D. G., Gray, T., Wilschut, K. J., Smith, B., van Vught, R., Shimizu, F., Sano, Y., Kanda, T., Marsh, G., et al. (2018) · Fluids and Barriers of the CNS · doi:10.1186/s12987-018-0108-3 · Cited by 353
Organ-on-a-chip platforms: a convergence of advanced materials, cells, and microscale technologies
Ahadian, S., Civitarese, R., Bannerman, D., Mohammadi, M. H., Lu, R., Wang, E., Davenport‐Huyer, L., Lai, B., Zhang, B., Zhao, Y., et al. (2018) · Advanced Healthcare Materials · doi:10.1002/adhm.201700506 · Cited by 315
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Helm, M. W., van der Meer, A. D., Eijkel, J. C. T., van den Berg, A., & Segerink, L. I.
- Venue
- Tissue Barriers
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-01-02
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1142493
- ISSN
- 2168-8362 (ISSN-L)
- 2168-8370
- OpenAlex
- W2333671040
- Cited by
- 333
- References
- 13
- FWCI
- 15.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microfluidic organ-on-chip technology for blood-brain barrier research. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/21688370.2016.1142493
- The paper
- van der Helm, M. W., van der Meer, A. D., Eijkel, J. C. T., van den Berg, A., & Segerink, L. I. (2016). Microfluidic organ-on-chip technology for blood-brain barrier research. Tissue Barriers. https://doi.org/10.1080/21688370.2016.1142493
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
