Cited by 20SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity after the severe Omicron wave of COVID-19 in Hong Kong

Open access
Poon, Rosana Wing-Shan, Chan, Brian Pui-Chun, Chan, Wan-Mui, Fong, Carol Ho-Yan, Zhang, Xiaojuan, Lu, Lu, Chen, Lin-Lei, Lam, Joy-Yan +5 more·2022·Emerging Microbes & Infections

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has led to a major wave of COVID-19 in Hong Kong between January and May 2022. Here, we used seroprevalence to estimate the combined incidence of vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 infection, including subclinical infection which were not diagnosed at the acute stage. The overall seropositive rate of IgG against receptor binding domain (anti-RBD IgG) increased from 52.2% in December 2021 to 89.3% in May 2022. The level of anti-RBD IgG was lowest in the 0-9 and ≥80 year-old age groups in May 2022. The seropositive rate of antibody against ORF8, which reflects the rate of prior infection, was 23.4% in May 2022. Our data suggest that although most individuals were either vaccinated or infected after the fifth wave, children and older adults remain most vulnerable. Public health measures should target these age groups in order to ameliorate the healthcare consequences of upcoming waves.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/22221751.2022.2106899

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reliance on healthy blood donors and voluntary child participants did not result in a material underestimate of COVID-19 seroprevalence in the general population.

    “These independent estimates provide confidence that our reliance on healthy blood donors and voluntary child participants did not result in a material underestimate of COVID-19 seroprevalence in the general population.”

    From Real-world COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the Omicron BA.2 variant in a SARS-CoV-2 infection-naive population (2023) · cites this paper as [51]

    The Methods description reports archived serum or plasma specimens, not a sample of healthy blood donors and voluntary child participants. The Discussion notes that specimens from hospital patients may not represent healthy people, but does not assess whether donor or child-participant selection materially underestimated population seroprevalence. Searches for blood donors, voluntary child participants, and independent estimates found no such assessment in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]4. Lu L, Mok BW, Chen LL, et al. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant by sera from BNT162b2 or coronavac vaccine recipients. Clin Infect Dis. 2021. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1041:ciab1041. PMC8754807 34915551 · DOI
  2. [6]6. Cheng VC, Ip JD, Chu AW, et al. Rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2 in a single-source community outbreak. Clin Infect Dis. 2022. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciac203:ciac203. PMC8992238 35271728 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poon, R. W.-S., Chan, B. P.-C., Chan, W.-M., Fong, C. H.-Y., Zhang, X., Lu, L., Chen, L.-L., Lam, J.-Y., Cheng, V. C.-C., Wong, S. S. Y., Kok, K.-H., Yuen, K.-Y., & To, K. K.-W.
Affiliations
  • Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
  • University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Hong Kong Science and Technology Parks Corporation (HK)
Corresponding author
To, Kelvin Kai-Wang
Venue
Emerging Microbes & Infections
Published
2022-09-05
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
2116-2119
ISSN
2222-1751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4287981083
Cited by
20
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 4
FWCI
2.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Emerging Microbes & Infections (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Ministry of Science and Technology
  • PRC
  • Foundation of Hubei Polytechnic University (2021YFC0866100)
  • Consultancy Service for Enhancing Laboratory Surveillance of Emerging Infectious Diseases and Research Capability on Antimicrobial Resistance for Department of Health of the Hong Kong SAR Government
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
Omicron variant, COVID-19 pandemic, seroprevalence, anti-RBD IgG, vaccination coverage, asymptomatic infection, age groups, children, older adults, Hong Kong
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Viral, Child, Hong Kong, Humans, Immunoglobulin G, Seroepidemiologic Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review