Cited by 77Categorization, perception, and languageLanguage Development and DisordersChild and Animal Learning Development

Categories, Concepts, and Conceptual Development

Open access
Sloutsky, Vladimir M., Deng, Wei (Sophia)·2019·Language, Cognition and Neuroscience

Abstract

Concepts (i.e. lexicalised classes of real or fictitious entities) play a central role in many human intellectual activities, including planning, thinking, reasoning, problem solving, and decision making. How do people acquire concepts in the course of development and learning and use them in their thinking about the world? In this article, we attempt to provide an overview of conceptual development. We suggest that concepts can originate (1) in interactions with the world and get lexicalised later or (2) in the language and get grounded later. The first route is from category learning to a concept, and we discuss this route by focusing on the mechanisms of category learning and developmental changes in these mechanisms. The second route is from a word to a concept, and we discuss this route by focusing on inferring word meanings without visual referents. We then consider proposals of how concepts get organised into networks and hierarchies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/23273798.2017.1391398

Cites

103 of 103 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. James W (1983/1890). The Principles of Psychology (originally published in 1890). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  2. Landau B, & Gleitman LR (1985). Language and experience: Evidence from the blind child. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sloutsky, V. M., & Deng, W. (.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Department of Psychology, University of Macau, Macau SAR, People’s Republic of China
Corresponding author
Sloutsky, Vladimir M.
Venue
Language, Cognition and Neuroscience
Published
2017-10-26
Volume
34
Issue
10
Pages
1284-1297
ISSN
  • 2327-3798 (ISSN-L)
  • 2327-3801
OpenAlex
W2766980932
Cited by
77
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
12.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Language Cognition and Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute for Educational Sciences (R305A140214)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01HD078545, P01HD080679)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
conceptual development, concepts, categories, category learning, lexicalization, language acquisition, word meaning inference, conceptual networks, concept hierarchy, cognitive development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review